Literature DB >> 10960203

Maintaining sevoflurane anesthesia during low-flow anesthesia using a single vaporizer setting change after overpressure induction.

J F Hendrickx1, D M Vandeput, A M De Geyndt, K P De Ridder, J S Haenen, T Deloof, A M De Wolf.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: A sevoflurane vaporizer dial setting of 1.9% was previously found to maintain the end-expired sevoflurane concentration (Et(sevo)) at 1.3% during maintenance of anesthesia for procedures up to one hour with an O(2) FGF of 1 L/min. We examined whether applying these parameters could simplify low-flow sevoflurane anesthesia after overpressure induction using two slightly different techniques.
DESIGN: Prospective clinical study.
SETTING: Large teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Sixteen patients receiving general anesthesia for a variety of peripheral procedures.
INTERVENTIONS: Anesthesia was induced with overpressure with sevoflurane (8%) in an 8 L. min(-1) O(2)/N(2)O mixture (30%/70%). After a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) was placed, fresh gas flow (FGF) was lowered to 1 L. min(-1) using O(2) and N(2)O (FiO(2) 30%) with patients breathing spontaneously. In group I patients (n = 8), the vaporizer dial was set at 1.9% at the same time the FGF was lowered. In group II patients (n = 8), the vaporizer was turned off until Et(sevo) had decreased to 1.3%, after which the dial was set at 1.9%. The course of Et(sevo) in the two groups was examined.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: In group I, Et(sevo) after 3 min was 4.88 +/- 1. 12%. Et(sevo) decreased slowly after reduction of FGF to 1.83 +/- 0. 19%, 1.59 +/- 0.18%, and 1.52 +/- 0.19% at 10, 20, and 30 min, respectively. In group II, Et(sevo) after 3 min was 4.34 +/- 0.84%, and decreased more rapidly after reduction of FGF to 1 L. min(-1) than in group I. Et(sevo) was 1.40 +/- 0.09%, 1.40 +/- 0.11%, and 1. 38 +/- 0.13% at 10, 20, and 30 min, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: After high-flow overpressure induction with sevoflurane, a single change in vaporizer setting (to 1.9%) and FGF (to 1 L. min(-1)) suffices for the Et(sevo) to approach the predicted Et(sevo) (1.3%) within 10-15 min; thereafter the Et(sevo) remains nearly constant. As expected, the predicted Et(sevo) is attained slightly faster when the vaporizer is temporarily turned off. Clinically applying previously derived pharmacokinetic parameters simplifies low-flow sevoflurane anesthesia after overpressure induction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10960203     DOI: 10.1016/s0952-8180(00)00159-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Anesth        ISSN: 0952-8180            Impact factor:   9.452


  4 in total

Review 1.  Induction of anaesthesia: a guide to drug choice.

Authors:  Nathalie Nathan; Isabelle Odin
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Kinetics and potency of halothane, isoflurane, and desflurane in the Northern Leopard frog Rana pipiens.

Authors:  L S Barter; J F Antognini
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 2.459

3.  Mathematical method to build an empirical model for inhaled anesthetic agent wash-in.

Authors:  Jan Fa Hendrickx; Harry Lemmens; Sofie De Cooman; André Aj Van Zundert; René Ej Grouls; Eric Mortier; Andre M De Wolf
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 2.217

4.  Minimal flow anesthesia can be initiated early with the use of higher fresh gas flow to facilitate desflurane "Wash-in".

Authors:  Mukul Chandra Kapoor; Ayalasomayajula Sashank; Ashok Vats; Shaloo Garg; Archana Puri
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019 Oct-Dec
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.