Literature DB >> 10958715

In vitro engineering of human stratified urothelium: analysis of its morphology and function.

S Sugasi1, Y Lesbros, I Bisson, Y Y Zhang, P Kucera, P Frey.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Gastric or intestinal patches, commonly used for reconstructive cystoplasty, may induce severe metabolic complications. The use of bladder tissues reconstructed in vitro could avoid these complications. We compared cellular differentiation and permeability characteristics of human native with in vitro cultured stratified urothelium.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Human stratified urothelium was induced in vitro. Morphology was studied with light and electron microscopy and expression of key cellular proteins was assessed using immunohistochemistry. Permeability coefficients were determined by measuring water, urea, ammonia and proton fluxes across the urothelium.
RESULTS: As in native urothelium the stratified urothelial construct consisted of basal membrane and basal, intermediate and superficial cell layers. The apical membrane of superficial cells formed villi and glycocalices, and tight junctions and desmosomes were developed. Immunohistochemistry showed similarities and differences in the expression of cytokeratins, integrin and cellular adhesion proteins. In the cultured urothelium cytokeratin 20 and integrin subunits alpha6 and beta4 were absent, and symplekin was expressed diffusely in all layers. Uroplakins were clearly expressed in the superficial umbrella cells of the urothelial constructs, however, they were also present in intermediate and basal cells. Symplekin and uroplakins were expressed only in the superficial cells of native bladder tissue. The urothelial constructs showed excellent viability, and functionally their permeabilities for water, urea and ammonia were no different from those measured in native human urothelium. Proton permeability was even lower in the constructs compared to that of native urothelium.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the in vitro cultured human stratified urothelium did not show complete terminal differentiation of its superficial cells, it retained the same barrier characteristics against the principal urine components. These results indicate that such in vitro cultured urothelium, after being grown on a compliant degradable support or in coculture with smooth muscle cells, is suitable for reconstructive cystoplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10958715     DOI: 10.1097/00005392-200009020-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  15 in total

1.  Expansion and long-term culture of differentiated normal rat urothelial cells in vitro.

Authors:  Y Y Zhang; B Ludwikowski; R Hurst; P Frey
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.416

2.  [Tissue engineering of the urinary bladder].

Authors:  G Ram-Liebig; O W Hakenberg; M P Wirth
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Induction of human embryonic and induced pluripotent stem cells into urothelium.

Authors:  Stephanie L Osborn; Ravikumar Thangappan; Ayala Luria; Justin H Lee; Jan Nolta; Eric A Kurzrock
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 6.940

Review 4.  [In vitro stratified urothelium and its relevance in reconstructive urology].

Authors:  S Maurer; G Feil; A Stenzl
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  [Tissue engineering and stem cell research in urology for a reconstructive or regenerative treatment approach].

Authors:  K-D Sievert; G Feil; M Renninger; C Selent; S Maurer; S Conrad; J Hennenlotter; U Nagele; R Schäfer; R Möhle; T Skutella; H Northoff; J Seibold; A Stenzl
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  [Bioartificial urothelium generated from bladder washings. A future therapeutic option for reconstructive surgery].

Authors:  G Feil; S Maurer; U Nagele; K-D Sievert; A Stenzl
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 7.  How to isolate urothelial cells? Comparison of four different methods and literature review.

Authors:  T Kloskowski; M Uzarska; N Gurtowska; J Olkowska; R Joachimiak; A Bajek; M Gagat; A Grzanka; M Bodnar; A Marszałek; T Drewa
Journal:  Hum Cell       Date:  2013-12-25       Impact factor: 4.174

8.  Urothelial proliferation and regeneration after spinal cord injury.

Authors:  F Aura Kullmann; Dennis R Clayton; Wily G Ruiz; Amanda Wolf-Johnston; Christian Gauthier; Anthony Kanai; Lori A Birder; Gerard Apodaca
Journal:  Am J Physiol Renal Physiol       Date:  2017-03-22

9.  A study of cytokeratin 20 immunostaining in the urothelium of neuropathic bladder of patients with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Subramanian Vaidyanathan; Ian W McDicken; Anna J Ikin; Paul Mansour; Bakul M Soni; Gurpreet Singh; Pradipkumar Sett
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2002-07-29       Impact factor: 2.264

10.  Immunocytochemical characterisation of cultures of human bladder mucosal cells.

Authors:  Jacqueline R Woodman; Kylie J Mansfield; Vittoria A Lazzaro; William Lynch; Elizabeth Burcher; Kate H Moore
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2011-04-18       Impact factor: 2.264

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.