Literature DB >> 10958583

Factor structure of the everyday memory questionnaire.

I M Cornish1.   

Abstract

Although the Everyday Memory Questionnaire (EMQ) has been used in numerous studies, no factor structure has vet been obtained from a reasonably large sample of non-clinical participants. The 28-item revised version of the EMQ was administered to 277 undergraduate students. Analysis showed five clear factors: retrieval, task monitoring, conversational monitoring, spatial memory, and memory for activities. In general, the factors appeared to reflect underlying memory processes rather than just similarities among test items, which suggested that using and developing tests of this kind might provide a means of studying the diversity of everyday memory phenomena in a unified fashion that would complement laboratory research. Issues about the nature of 'absent-mindedness' and the relationship between prospective and retrospective memory were discussed. Understanding the factor structure of the EMQ should also be useful in clinical applications of the test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10958583     DOI: 10.1348/000712600161916

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Psychol        ISSN: 0007-1269


  7 in total

1.  A systematic review of the association between fatigue and cognition in chronic noncommunicable diseases.

Authors:  Victoria Menzies; Debra L Kelly; Gee S Yang; Angela Starkweather; Debra E Lyon
Journal:  Chronic Illn       Date:  2019-03-18

2.  Improved Safety of Hybrid Electroconvulsive Therapy Compared With Standard Electroconvulsive Therapy in Patients With Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group Pilot Trial.

Authors:  Jing-Ya Zhang; Shu-Xian Xu; Lun Zeng; Li-Chang Chen; Jia Li; Zhao-Yun Jiang; Bai-Jian Tan; Chen-Long Gu; Wen-Tao Lai; Xiao-Ming Kong; Jian Wang; Han Rong; Xin-Hui Xie
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 5.435

3.  Cognitive response to fish oil, blueberry, and combined supplementation in older adults with subjective cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Robert K McNamara; Wilhelmina Kalt; Marcelle D Shidler; Jane McDonald; Suzanne S Summer; Amanda L Stein; Amanda N Stover; Robert Krikorian
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 4.673

4.  Assessment of Cognitive Impairment and Complaints in Individuals With Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Moira A Visovatti; Patricia A Reuter-Lorenz; Alfred E Chang; Laurel Northouse; Bernadine Cimprich
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.803

5.  Episodic and Semantic Autobiographical Memory and Everyday Memory during Late Childhood and Early Adolescence.

Authors:  Karen A Willoughby; Mary Desrocher; Brian Levine; Joanne F Rovet
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-02-28

6.  The clinical utility of informants' appraisals on prospective and retrospective memory in patients with early Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Yen-Hsuan Hsu; Ching-Feng Huang; Min-Chien Tu; Mau-Sun Hua
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Clinical Relevance of Specific Cognitive Complaints in Determining Mild Cognitive Impairment from Cognitively Normal States in a Study of Healthy Elderly Controls.

Authors:  Marina Ávila-Villanueva; Ana Rebollo-Vázquez; José M Ruiz-Sánchez de León; Meritxell Valentí; Miguel Medina; Miguel A Fernández-Blázquez
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 5.750

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.