PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVES: To assess cognitive function in individuals with colorectal cancer (CRC) and identify factors associated with cognitive effects. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, comparative design. . SETTING: Midwest hospital. . SAMPLE: Men and women with (n = 50) and without (n = 50) CRC. METHODS: Comparative and regression analyses were performed to assess the relationship between cognition and CRC. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Attention, cognitive control, and memory function were assessed with neuropsychological tests and self-report. . FINDINGS: Compared to healthy volunteers, individuals with CRC performed worse and reported more problems on tasks requiring attention and cognitive control (p < 0.05). After controlling for covariates, poorer performance on tasks of attention and cognitive control was associated (p < 0.001) with having CRC, older age, and less education. In contrast, poorer perceived attention and cognitive control were associated (p < 0.001) with greater fatigue but not CRC. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with CRC are vulnerable to cognitive problems. In addition, older age, less education, and fatigue can increase risk for worse cognitive performance and self-reported cognition. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Cognitive problems can profoundly affect an individual's ability to function in everyday life and cope with cancer. Nurses should assess for cognitive problems in patients with CRC and intervene to reduce distress.
PURPOSE/ OBJECTIVES: To assess cognitive function in individuals with colorectal cancer (CRC) and identify factors associated with cognitive effects. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, comparative design. . SETTING: Midwest hospital. . SAMPLE: Men and women with (n = 50) and without (n = 50) CRC. METHODS: Comparative and regression analyses were performed to assess the relationship between cognition and CRC. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Attention, cognitive control, and memory function were assessed with neuropsychological tests and self-report. . FINDINGS: Compared to healthy volunteers, individuals with CRC performed worse and reported more problems on tasks requiring attention and cognitive control (p < 0.05). After controlling for covariates, poorer performance on tasks of attention and cognitive control was associated (p < 0.001) with having CRC, older age, and less education. In contrast, poorer perceived attention and cognitive control were associated (p < 0.001) with greater fatigue but not CRC. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with CRC are vulnerable to cognitive problems. In addition, older age, less education, and fatigue can increase risk for worse cognitive performance and self-reported cognition. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Cognitive problems can profoundly affect an individual's ability to function in everyday life and cope with cancer. Nurses should assess for cognitive problems in patients with CRC and intervene to reduce distress.
Authors: John D Merriman; Catherine Jansen; Theresa Koetters; Claudia West; Marylin Dodd; Kathryn Lee; Steven M Paul; Bradley E Aouizerat; Bruce A Cooper; Patrick S Swift; William Wara; Christine Miaskowski Journal: Oncol Nurs Forum Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 2.172
Authors: Brent J Small; Kerri Sharp Rawson; Erin Walsh; Heather S L Jim; Tiffany F Hughes; Lindsay Iser; Michael A Andrykowski; Paul B Jacobsen Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-11-08 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Charles S Cleeland; Gary J Bennett; Robert Dantzer; Patrick M Dougherty; Adrian J Dunn; Christina A Meyers; Andrew H Miller; Richard Payne; James M Reuben; Xin Shelley Wang; Bang-Ning Lee Journal: Cancer Date: 2003-06-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Juan Antonio Cruzado; Sonia López-Santiago; Virginia Martínez-Marín; Gema José-Moreno; Ana Belén Custodio; Jaime Feliu Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2014-02-18 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Tim A Ahles; Andrew J Saykin; Brenna C McDonald; Yuelin Li; Charlotte T Furstenberg; Brett S Hanscom; Tamsin J Mulrooney; Gary N Schwartz; Peter A Kaufman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-09-13 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Fay Wright; Laura B Dunn; Steven M Paul; Yvette P Conley; Jon D Levine; Marilyn J Hammer; Bruce A Cooper; Christine Miaskowski; Kord M Kober Journal: Cancer Nurs Date: 2019 Sep/Oct Impact factor: 2.592
Authors: Inger Utne; Borghild Løyland; Ellen Karine Grov; Hege Lund Rasmussen; Ann Helen Torstveit; Bruce A Cooper; Judy Mastick; Melissa Mazor; Melisa Wong; Steven M Paul; Yvette P Conley; Thierry Jahan; Christine Ritchie; Jon D Levine; Christine Miaskowski Journal: Eur J Oncol Nurs Date: 2018-08-22 Impact factor: 2.398
Authors: Juliet Shih; Heather Leutwyler; Christine Ritchie; Steven M Paul; Jon D Levine; Bruce Cooper; Fay Wright; Yvette P Conley; Christine Miaskowski Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2016-10-20 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Mi Sook Jung; Moira Visovatti; Mijung Kim; Kyengin Cha; Nondumiso Dlamini; Xirong Cui Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2022-08-03 Impact factor: 3.359
Authors: Moira A Visovatti; Mi Sook Jung; Heidi Mason; Mary Beth DeRubeis; Francis P Worden; Debra L Barton Journal: Cancer Nurs Date: 2022-01-12 Impact factor: 2.760
Authors: Cecilia Margareta Lund; M K Mikkelsen; S Theile; H M Michelsen; M Schultz; L Sengeløv; D L Nielsen Journal: Oncologist Date: 2022-03-04 Impact factor: 5.837
Authors: Natalie G Regier; Aanand D Naik; Elizabeth A Mulligan; Ziad S Nasreddine; Jane A Driver; Yvonne H-F Sada; Jennifer Moye Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2019-06-13 Impact factor: 3.894