Literature DB >> 10955781

Comparative pharmacokinetic analysis of 5-fluorouracil and its major metabolite 5-fluoro-5,6-dihydrouracil after conventional and reduced test dose in cancer patients.

G Bocci1, R Danesi, A D Di Paolo, F Innocenti, G Allegrini, A Falcone, A Melosi, M Battistoni, G Barsanti, P F Conte, M Del Tacca.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and its major metabolite 5-fluoro-5,6-dihydrouracil (5-FDHU) in 20 colorectal cancer patients given two dose levels of 5-FU, 250 and 370 mg/m2, administered by i.v. bolus. A reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic method was used for the simultaneous assay of 5-FU and 5-FDHU in plasma samples obtained at baseline and at multiple time points from 5 min to 4 h after 5-FU bolus as well as to assess the activity of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) before 5-FU dosing. Plasma pharmacokinetic parameters of patients given 250 mg/m2 5-FU were significantly different from those receiving 370 mg/m2; main differences were observed in the trapezoidal areas under the plasma levels-versus-time curve from to to the last measurable concentration (area under the curve, 3.77+/-0.21 versus 13.61+/-2.3 h x microg/ml), peak plasma concentration (Cmax, 18.15+/-1.35 versus 48.41+/-7.69 microg/ml), and total body clearance (CL(TB), 54.64+/-3.54 versus 25.43+/-2.3 l/h/m2). Significant differences were also observed in the main pharmacokinetic parameters of 5-FDHU after 250 and 370 mg/m2 5-FU including the area under the curve from to to 4 h (5.39+/-0.32 versus 8.75+/-1.24 h x microg/ml), Cmax (3.60+/-0.16 versus 5.26+/-0.55 microg/ml) and time to Cmax (Tmax, 0.45+/-0.03 versus 0.69+/-0.06 h). The mean DPD activity in PBMCs in this group of patients was 205.7+/-36.4 pmol of 5-FDHU/min/mg of protein and was within the normal range; however, no significant correlations were found between 5-FU or 5-FDHU pharmacokinetic parameters at two dose levels and DPD activity of PBMCs. The results of the present study provide the first detailed comparison of the distribution of 5-FU and its major metabolite 5-FDHU at the therapeutic level as well as at reduced test dose levels to obtain pharmacokinetic data to be used as reference values for the identification of patients at risk of major 5-FU toxicity due to impaired metabolism to 5-FDHU.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10955781

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  32 in total

1.  Apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 2 is necessary for normal B cell development and recovery of lymphoid progenitors after chemotherapeutic challenge.

Authors:  Jeroen E J Guikema; Rachel M Gerstein; Erin K Linehan; Erin K Cloherty; Eric Evan-Browning; Daisuke Tsuchimoto; Yusaku Nakabeppu; Carol E Schrader
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 5.422

2.  Clinical, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic evaluations of metronomic UFT and cyclophosphamide plus celecoxib in patients with advanced refractory gastrointestinal cancers.

Authors:  Giacomo Allegrini; Teresa Di Desidero; Maria Teresa Barletta; Anna Fioravanti; Paola Orlandi; Bastianina Canu; Silvio Chericoni; Fotios Loupakis; Antonello Di Paolo; Gianluca Masi; Andrea Fontana; Sara Lucchesi; Giada Arrighi; Mario Giusiani; Andrea Ciarlo; Giovanni Brandi; Romano Danesi; Robert S Kerbel; Alfredo Falcone; Guido Bocci
Journal:  Angiogenesis       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 9.596

Review 3.  Pharmacogenetics: a tool for individualizing antineoplastic therapy.

Authors:  F Innocenti; L Iyer; M J Ratain
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.447

4.  Influence of cytokines, monoclonal antibodies and chemotherapeutic drugs on epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) and LewisY antigen expression.

Authors:  D Flieger; A S Hoff; T Sauerbruch; I G Schmidt-Wolf
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  iTRAQ Quantitative Proteomic Profiling and MALDI-MSI of Colon Cancer Spheroids Treated with Combination Chemotherapies in a 3D Printed Fluidic Device.

Authors:  Gabriel J LaBonia; Katelyn R Ludwig; C Bruce Mousseau; Amanda B Hummon
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 6.  Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Oncology: International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology Recommendations for 5-Fluorouracil Therapy.

Authors:  Jan H Beumer; Edward Chu; Carmen Allegra; Yusuke Tanigawara; Gerard Milano; Robert Diasio; Tae Won Kim; Ron H Mathijssen; Li Zhang; Dirk Arnold; Katsuki Muneoka; Narikazu Boku; Markus Joerger
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2018-09-11       Impact factor: 6.875

7.  Lymph node effective vascular permeability and chemotherapy uptake.

Authors:  Eelco F J Meijer; Cedric Blatter; Ivy X Chen; Echoe Bouta; Dennis Jones; Ethel R Pereira; Keehoon Jung; Benjamin J Vakoc; James W Baish; Timothy P Padera
Journal:  Microcirculation       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.628

8.  Relationships between body composition parameters and fluorouracil pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Milena Gusella; Sivia Toso; Eros Ferrazzi; Mariano Ferrari; Roberto Padrini
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.335

9.  A Stability-Indicating RP-HPLC Assay Method for 5-Fluorouracil.

Authors:  V R Sinha; R V Kumar; J R Bhinge
Journal:  Indian J Pharm Sci       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 0.975

10.  Abdominal irradiation modulates 5-Fluorouracil pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  Chen-Hsi Hsieh; Yen-Ju Hsieh; Chia-Yuan Liu; Hung-Chi Tai; Yu-Chuen Huang; Pei-Wei Shueng; Le-Jung Wu; Li-Ying Wang; Tung-Hu Tsai; Yu-Jen Chen
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 5.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.