AIMS: To verify whether fluorouracil (FU) clearance (CL) and volume of distribution (V(ss)) are better correlated with specific body compartments, such as body cell mass (BCM), total body water (TBW) or fat free mass (FFM), rather than with body surface area (BSA) or total body weight (BW). METHODS: Thirty-four patients (13 females and 21 males) affected by colorectal cancer and receiving FU as adjuvant therapy entered the study. CL and Vss were determined after a 2 min i.v. injection of FU (425 mg m(-2)) and leucovorin (20 mg m(-2)). Body composition, in terms of BCM, TBW and FFM, was evaluated non-invasively by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). RESULTS: Significant but poor correlations were found between CL or V(ss) and most anthropometric parameters, including BIA-derived measures (r2 range=0.10-0.21). However, when multiple regression analysis was performed with sex, TBW and FFM as independent variables, the correlations improved greatly. The best correlation was obtained between CL and sex (r2=0.44) and between V(ss) and sex (r2=0.36). FFM-normalized CL was significantly higher in women than in men (0.030+/-0.008 vs 0.022+/-0.005 l min(-1) kg)(-1); 95% CI of difference 0.012, 0.003; P=0.003), suggesting that FU metabolism is more rapid in females. Surprisingly, V(ss) was highly correlated with CL (r2=0.67; CL=0.52+V(ss) x 0.040). This finding may either be explained by extensive drug metabolism in extra-hepatic organs or by variable inactivation on first-pass through the lung. Both these hypotheses need experimental validation. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics of FU are better predicted by FFM and TBW than by standard anthropometric parameters and predictions are sex-dependent. The use of BIA may lead to improved dosing with FU.
AIMS: To verify whether fluorouracil (FU) clearance (CL) and volume of distribution (V(ss)) are better correlated with specific body compartments, such as body cell mass (BCM), total body water (TBW) or fat free mass (FFM), rather than with body surface area (BSA) or total body weight (BW). METHODS: Thirty-four patients (13 females and 21 males) affected by colorectal cancer and receiving FU as adjuvant therapy entered the study. CL and Vss were determined after a 2 min i.v. injection of FU (425 mg m(-2)) and leucovorin (20 mg m(-2)). Body composition, in terms of BCM, TBW and FFM, was evaluated non-invasively by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). RESULTS: Significant but poor correlations were found between CL or V(ss) and most anthropometric parameters, including BIA-derived measures (r2 range=0.10-0.21). However, when multiple regression analysis was performed with sex, TBW and FFM as independent variables, the correlations improved greatly. The best correlation was obtained between CL and sex (r2=0.44) and between V(ss) and sex (r2=0.36). FFM-normalized CL was significantly higher in women than in men (0.030+/-0.008 vs 0.022+/-0.005 l min(-1) kg)(-1); 95% CI of difference 0.012, 0.003; P=0.003), suggesting that FU metabolism is more rapid in females. Surprisingly, V(ss) was highly correlated with CL (r2=0.67; CL=0.52+V(ss) x 0.040). This finding may either be explained by extensive drug metabolism in extra-hepatic organs or by variable inactivation on first-pass through the lung. Both these hypotheses need experimental validation. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacokinetics of FU are better predicted by FFM and TBW than by standard anthropometric parameters and predictions are sex-dependent. The use of BIA may lead to improved dosing with FU.
Authors: C Narjoz; A Cessot; A Thomas-Schoemann; J L Golmard; O Huillard; P Boudou-Rouquette; A Behouche; F Taieb; J P Durand; A Dauphin; R Coriat; M Vidal; M Tod; J Alexandre; M A Loriot; F Goldwasser; B Blanchet Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2014-10-25 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: S Gérard; D Bréchemier; A Lefort; S Lozano; G Abellan Van Kan; T Filleron; L Mourey; C Bernard-Marty; M E Rougé-Bugat; V Soler; B Vellas; M Cesari; Y Rolland; L Balardy Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2016 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: James P Carroll; Melinda M Protani; Linda Nguyen; Matthew E Cheng; Mike Fay; Mohamed Saleem; Praga S Pillay; Euan Walpole; Jennifer H Martin Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2014-02-19 Impact factor: 3.064
Authors: C M Lack; G J Lesser; U N Umesi; J Bowns; M Y Chen; D Case; R C Hightower; A J Johnson Journal: Clin Radiol Date: 2016-01-12 Impact factor: 2.350
Authors: Sophie Cousin; A Hollebecque; S Koscielny; O Mir; A Varga; V E Baracos; J C Soria; S Antoun Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2013-12-17 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Elizabeth M Cespedes Feliciano; Valerie S Lee; Carla M Prado; Jeffrey A Meyerhardt; Stacey Alexeeff; Candyce H Kroenke; Jingjie Xiao; Adrienne L Castillo; Bette J Caan Journal: Cancer Date: 2017-09-07 Impact factor: 6.860