Literature DB >> 10954476

Ultrafast MR imaging of the normal posterior fossa in fetuses.

M M Stazzone1, A M Hubbard, L T Bilaniuk, M P Harty, J S Meyer, R A Zimmerman, S Mahboubi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to determine if a standard imaging protocol using ultrafast MR sequences could adequately reveal normal posterior fossa anatomy in fetuses and, if so, to document a template on MR imaging for normal posterior fossa development.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review found 66 MR imaging studies of 63 fetuses, 16-39 weeks' gestation age (mean, 25 weeks' gestation), who were referred between June 1996 and May 1999 for evaluation of non-central nervous system anomalies revealed on prenatal sonography. All fetuses had normal brains and spines on prenatal sonography. The standard MR imaging protocol included axial, sagittal, and coronal half-Fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin echo (HASTE); sagittal and coronal two-dimensional fast low-angle shot (FLASH); and axial turbo T1-weighted FLASH images through the fetal brain. Structures that we analyzed were the fourth ventricle, the cisterna magna, the vermis, the cerebellar hemispheres, and the brainstem. Using the HASTE sequences, we documented gestational age-specific signal intensity changes in the cerebellar hemispheres and the brainstem.
RESULTS: The posterior fossa anatomy was sufficiently well defined to exclude abnormalities of the fourth ventricle and cerebellar vermis in all cases. Because of high T2-weighting, good contrast enhancement, and good signal-to-noise ratios, HASTE images provided the best anatomic definition of the posterior fossa.
CONCLUSION: Normal posterior fossa anatomy can be adequately shown on ultrafast MR images, which can be helpful when prenatal sonography is equivocal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10954476     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.175.3.1750835

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  10 in total

1.  Assessment of cortical maturation with prenatal MRI. Part I: Normal cortical maturation.

Authors:  Céline Fogliarini; Katia Chaumoitre; Frédérique Chapon; Carla Fernandez; Olivier Lévrier; Dominique Figarella-Branger; Nadine Girard
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-04-23       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the fetal brain and spine: an increasingly important tool in prenatal diagnosis, part 1.

Authors:  O A Glenn; A J Barkovich
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Liver, meconium, haemorrhage: the value of T1-weighted images in fetal MRI.

Authors:  Jan Zizka; Pavel Elias; Karel Hodik; Jaroslav Tintera; Vera Juttnerova; Zdenek Belobradek; Ludovit Klzo
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2006-06-24

4.  Prenatal magnetic resonance imaging: brain normal linear biometric values below 24 gestational weeks.

Authors:  C Parazzini; A Righini; M Rustico; D Consonni; F Triulzi
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 5.  Fetal magnetic resonance imaging in obstetric practice.

Authors:  Aydın Köşüş; Nermin Köşüş; Betül Usluoğulları; Müzeyyen Duran; Nilgün Öztürk Turhan; Mehmet Tekşam
Journal:  J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc       Date:  2011-03-01

Review 6.  MRI of the fetal posterior fossa.

Authors:  Catherine Adamsbaum; Marie Laure Moutard; Christine André; Valérie Merzoug; Solène Ferey; Marie Pierre Quéré; Fanny Lewin; Catherine Fallet-Bianco
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2004-11-23

7.  Magnetic resonance imaging versus ultrasonography in fetal pathology.

Authors:  A Perrone; S Savelli; C Maggi; L Di Pietro; M Di Maurizio; J Tesei; L Ballesio; C De Felice; A Giancotti; R Di Iorio; L Manganaro
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 3.469

8.  How accurately does current fetal imaging identify posterior fossa anomalies?

Authors:  Catherine Limperopoulos; Richard L Robertson; Omar S Khwaja; Caroline D Robson; Judy A Estroff; Carole Barnewolt; Deborah Levine; Donna Morash; Luanne Nemes; Linda Zaccagnini; Adré J du Plessis
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 9.  Investigation of normal organ development with fetal MRI.

Authors:  Daniela Prayer; Peter C Brugger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 7.034

10.  MR imaging of the fetal brain.

Authors:  Orit A Glenn
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2009-11-24
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.