Literature DB >> 10953563

[Prognostic factors in gastric cancer. Our experience and review of the literature].

A Z Manfè1, P Segalina, A Maffei Faccioli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This review of the latest literature and retrospective analysis of the authors' series aimed to identify the most relevant prognostic factors for gastric cancer.
METHODS: A total of 81 patients were operated in our series from 1980 onwards. Eighteen patients underwent minor surgery and 5 were not treated. All resected patients underwent R2 lymphadenectomy.
RESULTS: In the majority of cases the histiotype was found to be adenocarcinoma. Undifferentiated forms were only found in 8 cases. The prognostic factors identified in our series and in the most recent literature were age, lesion sites, histiotype, the number of metastatic lymph nodes and T3. The poor prognosis in younger patients may be explained by late diagnosis and more aggressive tumours. Neoplasms in the upper third of the stomach have a worse prognosis owing to a faster metastasis rate, lymphatic drainage directly into the left para-aortic lymph nodes and lack of serosa in the gastric fundus, meaning that in practice T2 becomes T3. Lymphatic diffusion represents one of the most important factors, in particular the number of lymph nodes affected by the tumour is decisive for prognosis: from the literature, in both T1-T2 and T3-T4, if > or = 5 lymph nodes are positive then survival rates decrease significantly.
CONCLUSIONS: From our personal experience, N2 determines the prognosis in both T2 and T3. N2 is important, but survival diminishes in T3, thus demonstrating the importance of serous infiltration. The majority of Western and Japanese authors deem that T3 represents one of the decisive factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10953563

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Minerva Chir        ISSN: 0026-4733            Impact factor:   1.000


  8 in total

1.  Prognosis of gastric cancer patients with node-negative metastasis following curative resection: outcomes of the survival and recurrence.

Authors:  Jingyu Deng; Han Liang; Dan Sun; Rupeng Zhang; Hongjie Zhan; Xiaona Wang
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.522

2.  Investigation of the recurrence patterns of gastric cancer following a curative resection.

Authors:  Jingyu Deng; Han Liang; Dianchang Wang; Dan Sun; Yi Pan; Yong Liu
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  The effectiveness of the new (7th) UICC N classification in the prognosis evaluation of gastric cancer patients: a comparative study between the 5th/6th and 7th UICC N classification.

Authors:  Sumin Chae; Anbok Lee; Joo-Ho Lee
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 4.  Clinical significance of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Jing-Yu Deng; Han Liang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Correlation of tumor-positive ratio and number of perigastric lymph nodes with prognosis of patients with surgically-removed gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  Yong-Bin Ding; Guo-Yu Chen; Jian-Guo Xia; Xi-Wei Zang; Hong-Yu Yang; Li Yang; Yue-Xian Liu
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-01-15       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  The evaluation of metastatic lymph node ratio staging system in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Yanbing Zhou; Jizhun Zhang; Shougen Cao; Yu Li
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 7.370

7.  Five-year Survival Rate for Gastric Cancer in Yazd Province, Central Iran, from 2001 to 2008.

Authors:  Mohsen Akhondi-Meybodi; Marzieh Ghane; Sara Akhondi-Meybodi; Golnaz Dashti
Journal:  Middle East J Dig Dis       Date:  2017-01

8.  Influential Factors on Survival in Gastric Cancer: A Single-center Study.

Authors:  Ghodratollah Roshanaei; Azadeh Kiumarsi; Amir Kasaeian; Malihe Safari; Mohammad Abbasi; Ali Rahimi
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 1.852

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.