Literature DB >> 10949774

Epidemiologic evidence and causal inference.

D L Weed1.   

Abstract

Preventing cancer depends on the ability to recognize and remove causal factors. In current practice, the methods used to judge cause from epidemiologic, clinical trials and biologic evidence include systematic narrative reviews, criteria-based inference methods, and meta-analysis. Subjectivity and values play a key role in the practice of causal inference, especially in selecting criteria and assigning rules of evidence to those criteria. Judging cause is a central concern of physicians, epidemiologists, and other public health professionals committed to cancer prevention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10949774     DOI: 10.1016/s0889-8588(05)70312-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hematol Oncol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0889-8588            Impact factor:   3.722


  4 in total

1.  The ethics of alpha: reflections on statistics, evidence and values in medicine.

Authors:  R E Upshur
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2001

2.  How strong is the evidence that solar ultraviolet B and vitamin D reduce the risk of cancer?: An examination using Hill's criteria for causality.

Authors:  William B Grant
Journal:  Dermatoendocrinol       Date:  2009-01

3.  The replication crisis in epidemiology: snowball, snow job, or winter solstice?

Authors:  Timothy L Lash; Lindsay J Collin; Miriam E Van Dyke
Journal:  Curr Epidemiol Rep       Date:  2018-04-12

4.  The role of causal criteria in causal inferences: Bradford Hill's "aspects of association".

Authors:  Andrew C Ward
Journal:  Epidemiol Perspect Innov       Date:  2009-06-17
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.