Literature DB >> 10949501

Identification of tibial stress fractures using therapeutic continuous ultrasound.

W A Romani1, D H Perrin, R G Dussault, D W Ball, D M Kahler.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: One-group discriminant analysis.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether 1 MHz of continuous ultrasound can identify tibial stress fractures in subjects.
BACKGROUND: Stress fractures can lead to loss of function or to more serious nonunion fractures. Early diagnosis is important to reduce the risk of further injury and to assure a safe return to activity. Therapeutic ultrasound has been reported to be an accessible, less expensive alternative in diagnosing stress fractures compared with other diagnostic techniques. METHODS AND MEASURES: Twenty-six subjects (12 men, 20.33 +/- 1.37 years; 14 women, 20.78 +/- 3.8 years) with unilateral tibia pain for less than 2 weeks volunteered to participate in the study. Continuous, 1 MHz ultrasound was applied to the uninvolved and involved tibias at 7 increasing intensities for 30 seconds each. Subjects completed a visual analog scale after the application of each intensity to assess the pain response to ultrasound. Results from the visual analog scale were compared to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings to determine if continuous ultrasound could predict whether subjects had a normal MRI, increased bone remodeling, or advanced bone remodeling consistent with a stress fracture.
RESULTS: Discriminant analysis on the visual analog scale correctly classified subjects into 1 of 3 clinical classification groups in 42.31% of the cases. None of the subjects found to have a stress fracture by MRI were correctly identified by continuous ultrasound. This resulted in a predicted sensitivity of 0% and a predicted specificity of 100%.
CONCLUSIONS: A protocol using visual analog scores after the application of 1 MHz continuous ultrasound is not sensitive for identifying subjects with tibial stress fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10949501     DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2000.30.8.444

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 0190-6011            Impact factor:   4.751


  8 in total

1.  Role of Ultrasound Therapy in the Healing of Tibial Stress Fractures.

Authors:  Y K Yadav; K R Salgotra; A Banerjee
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

2.  Usage Patterns and Beliefs about Therapeutic Ultrasound by Canadian Physical Therapists: An Exploratory Population-Based Cross-Sectional Survey.

Authors:  Susan Armijo-Olivo; Jorge Fuentes; Iain Muir; Douglas P Gross
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.037

3.  Update on stress fractures in female athletes: epidemiology, treatment, and prevention.

Authors:  Yin-Ting Chen; Adam S Tenforde; Michael Fredericson
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2013-06

4.  Mechanisms and management of stress fractures in physically active persons.

Authors:  William A Romani; Joe H Gieck; David H Perrin; Ethan N Saliba; David M Kahler
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  DISTAL FIBULAR STRESS FRACTURE IN A FEMALE RECREATIONAL RUNNER: A CASE REPORT WITH MUSCULOSKELETAL ULTRASOUND IMAGING FINDINGS.

Authors:  Lisa T Hoglund; Karin Grävare Silbernagel; Nicholas R Taweel
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-12

6.  Stress fractures: definition, diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  Diego Costa Astur; Fernando Zanatta; Gustavo Gonçalves Arliani; Eduardo Ramalho Moraes; Alberto de Castro Pochini; Benno Ejnisman
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2015-12-30

7.  Ultrasound-Diagnosed Tibia Stress Fracture: A Case Report.

Authors:  Adae Amoako; Ayesha Abid; Anthony Shadiack; Robert Monaco
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Arthritis Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-04-10

8.  Prospective Assessment of Clinical Tests Used to Evaluate Tibial Stress Fracture.

Authors:  Michael D Rosenthal; Mitchell J Rauh; James E Cowan
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-09-16
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.