Literature DB >> 10947100

Effect of magnesium mica on performance and carcass quality of growing-finishing swine.

J K Apple1, C V Maxwell, B deRodas, H B Watson, Z B Johnson.   

Abstract

A total of 240 crossbred pigs were used in two experiments to determine the effect of feeding magnesium mica (MM) during the growing-finishing period on animal performance and pork carcass characteristics. All pigs were blocked by weight, and treatments were assigned randomly to pens (five pigs/pen) within blocks. In each experiment, eight pens were allotted randomly to one of three treatments: 1) a negative control corn-soybean meal starter, grower, and finisher diet devoid of supplemental magnesium; 2) the control diets supplemented with 1.25% MM; and 3) the control diets supplemented with 2.50% MM. In Exp. 1, pigs were slaughtered at the University of Arkansas Red Meat Abattoir, whereas pigs in Exp. 2 were transported to a commercial pork packing plant and slaughtered according to industry-accepted procedures. In both experiments, dietary supplementation of MM had no (P > .10) effect on ADG, ADFI, or gain:feed ratio at any phase during the growing-finishing period. In Exp. 1, MM supplementation had no (P > .10) effect on carcass fatness or muscling. Moreover, Japanese color scores were not (P > .10) affected by feeding pigs MM; however, American color scores increased linearly (P < .01) with increasing levels of MM in the diet. Although MM supplementation did not (P > .10) affect L* and b* values for the longissimus muscle (LM), there was a linear increase (P < .05) in LM a* and chroma values associated with increased MM levels in swine diets. In Exp. 2, carcasses from pigs fed 1.25% MM had less (P < .05) fat opposite the LM at the 10th rib than untreated controls and pigs fed 2.50% MM and higher (P < .10) percentages of muscle than carcasses of untreated controls. Moreover, the LM from pigs fed 1.25% MM was less (P < .05) red and less (P < .05) yellow than the LM from pigs fed the control or 2.50% MM-supplemented diets. Drip loss from the LM was unaffected (P > .10) by inclusion of MM in the diet. Results from this study confirm that inclusion of MM, an inexpensive, inorganic magnesium source, in diets of growing-finishing swine has beneficial effects on pork carcass cutability and quality with no deleterious effects on live animal performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10947100     DOI: 10.2527/2000.7882135x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  5 in total

1.  Effects of reducing dietary crude protein levels and replacement with crystalline amino acids on growth performance, carcass composition, and fresh pork quality of finishing pigs fed ractopamine hydrochloride.

Authors:  J K Apple; C V Maxwell; B E Bass; J W S Yancey; R L Payne; J Thomson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Effects of Organic Chromium Yeast on Performance, Meat Quality, and Serum Parameters of Grow-Finish Pigs.

Authors:  Yunhan Liu; Bin Huo; Zhongping Chen; Kun Wang; Lingjie Huang; Lianqiang Che; Bin Feng; Yan Lin; Shengyu Xu; Yong Zhuo; Caimei Wu; Zhengfeng Fang
Journal:  Biol Trace Elem Res       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 3.738

3.  Effects of Short-term Feeding Magnesium before Slaughter on Blood Metabolites and Postmortem Muscle Traits of Halothane-carrier Pigs.

Authors:  Jing Chen; XianJun Liu; LianQuan Bian
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.509

Review 4.  The Contribution of Dietary Magnesium in Farm Animals and Human Nutrition.

Authors:  Luciano Pinotti; Michele Manoni; Luca Ferrari; Marco Tretola; Roberta Cazzola; Ian Givens
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 5.717

5.  Dietary Supplementation of Magnesium Sulfate during Late Gestation and Lactation Affects the Milk Composition and Immunoglobulin Levels in Sows.

Authors:  W X Hou; S Y Cheng; S T Liu; B M Shi; A S Shan
Journal:  Asian-Australas J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 2.509

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.