Literature DB >> 10946318

Distribution of DNA vaccines determines their immunogenicity after intramuscular injection in mice.

M Dupuis1, K Denis-Mize, C Woo, C Goldbeck, M J Selby, M Chen, G R Otten, J B Ulmer, J J Donnelly, G Ott, D M McDonald.   

Abstract

Intramuscular injection of DNA vaccines elicits potent humoral and cellular immune responses in mice. However, DNA vaccines are less efficient in larger animal models and humans. To gain a better understanding of the factors limiting the efficacy of DNA vaccines, we used fluorescence-labeled plasmid DNA in mice to 1) define the macroscopic and microscopic distribution of DNA after injection into the tibialis anterior muscle, 2) characterize cellular uptake and expression of DNA in muscle and draining lymph nodes, and 3) determine the effect of modifying DNA distribution and cellular uptake by volume changes or electroporation on the magnitude of the immune response. Injection of a standard 50-microl dose resulted in the rapid dispersion of labeled DNA throughout the muscle. DNA was internalized within 5 min by muscle cells near the injection site and over several hours by cells that were located along muscle fibers and in the draining lymph nodes. Histochemical staining and analysis of mRNA expression in isolated cells by RT-PCR showed that the transgene was detectably expressed only by muscle cells, despite substantial DNA uptake by non-muscle cells. Reduction of the injection volume to 5 microl resulted in substantially less uptake and expression of DNA by muscle cells, and correspondingly lower immune responses against the transgene product. However, expression and immunogenicity were restored when the 5-microl injection was followed by electroporation in vivo. These findings indicate that distribution and cellular uptake significantly affect the immunogenicity of DNA vaccines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10946318     DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.165.5.2850

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Immunol        ISSN: 0022-1767            Impact factor:   5.422


  85 in total

1.  Virus-like particles as vaccine adjuvants.

Authors:  S C Gilbert
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.695

Review 2.  Dendritic cell delivery of plasmid DNA. Applications for controlled genetic immunization.

Authors:  R J Mumper; H C Ledebur
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.695

3.  Gene transfer: how can the biological barriers be overcome?

Authors:  Jean-Michel Escoffre; Justin Teissié; Marie-Pierre Rols
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2010-07-10       Impact factor: 1.843

4.  Transgene expression and local tissue distribution of naked and polymer-condensed plasmid DNA after intradermal administration in mice.

Authors:  R Noelle Palumbo; Xiao Zhong; David Panus; Wenqing Han; Weihang Ji; Chun Wang
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 9.776

5.  Horizontal gene transfer from macrophages to ischemic muscles upon delivery of naked DNA with Pluronic block copolymers.

Authors:  Vivek Mahajan; Zagit Gaymalov; Daria Alakhova; Richa Gupta; Irving H Zucker; Alexander V Kabanov
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2015-10-09       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  DNA vaccine construct incorporating intercellular trafficking and intracellular targeting motifs effectively primes and induces memory B- and T-cell responses in outbred animals.

Authors:  Waithaka Mwangi; Wendy C Brown; Gary A Splitter; Christopher J Davies; Chris J Howard; Jayne C Hope; Yoko Aida; Yan Zhuang; Beverly J Hunter; Guy H Palmer
Journal:  Clin Vaccine Immunol       Date:  2007-01-10

Review 7.  DNA vaccines: developing new strategies to enhance immune responses.

Authors:  Shaheed A Abdulhaqq; David B Weiner
Journal:  Immunol Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.829

8.  In vivo electroporation of minicircle DNA as a novel method of vaccine delivery to enhance HIV-1-specific immune responses.

Authors:  Qingtao Wang; Wei Jiang; Yuhai Chen; Pengyu Liu; Chunjie Sheng; Shuai Chen; Hui Zhang; Changchuan Pan; Shijuan Gao; Wenlin Huang
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 5.103

9.  Tolerability of intramuscular and intradermal delivery by CELLECTRA(®) adaptive constant current electroporation device in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Malissa C Diehl; Jessica C Lee; Stephen E Daniels; Pablo Tebas; Amir S Khan; Mary Giffear; Niranjan Y Sardesai; Mark L Bagarazzi
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Trial watch: Naked and vectored DNA-based anticancer vaccines.

Authors:  Norma Bloy; Aitziber Buqué; Fernando Aranda; Francesca Castoldi; Alexander Eggermont; Isabelle Cremer; Catherine Sautès-Fridman; Jitka Fucikova; Jérôme Galon; Radek Spisek; Eric Tartour; Laurence Zitvogel; Guido Kroemer; Lorenzo Galluzzi
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 8.110

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.