Literature DB >> 10944509

Comparing sensory experiences across individuals: recent psychophysical advances illuminate genetic variation in taste perception.

L M Bartoshuk1.   

Abstract

Modern psychophysics has traveled considerably beyond the threshold measures that dominated sensory studies in the first half of this century. Current methods capture the range of perceived intensity from threshold to maximum and promise to provide increasingly accurate comparisons of perceived intensities across individuals. The application of new psychophysical tools to genetic variation in taste allowed us to discover supertasters, individuals who live in particularly intense taste worlds. Because of the anatomy of the taste system, supertasters feel more burn from oral irritants like chili peppers, more creaminess/ viscosity from fats and thickeners in food and may also experience more intense oral pain. Not surprisingly, these sensory differences influence food choices and thus health. A discussion of the milestones on the road to understanding genetic variation in taste must include discussion of some potholes as well. Often our failures have been as instructive as our successes in the effort to evaluate the impact of genetic variation in taste.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10944509     DOI: 10.1093/chemse/25.4.447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  71 in total

1.  Influence of the perceived taste intensity of chemesthetic stimuli on swallowing parameters given age and genetic taste differences in healthy adult women.

Authors:  Cathy A Pelletier; Catriona M Steele
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Factors contributing to individual differences in sucrose preference.

Authors:  M Yanina Pepino; Julie A Mennella
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 3.  Beyond the Paleolithic prescription: incorporating diversity and flexibility in the study of human diet evolution.

Authors:  Bethany L Turner; Amanda L Thompson
Journal:  Nutr Rev       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 7.110

4.  Effects of club soda and ginger brew on linguapalatal pressures in healthy swallowing.

Authors:  Kate Krival; Crystal Bates
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 3.438

5.  Association between 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) bitterness and colonic neoplasms.

Authors:  Marc D Basson; Linda M Bartoshuk; Susan Z Dichello; Lisa Panzini; James M Weiffenbach; Valerie B Duffy
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 6.  Psychophysics of sweet and fat perception in obesity: problems, solutions and new perspectives.

Authors:  Linda M Bartoshuk; Valerie B Duffy; John E Hayes; Howard R Moskowitz; Derek J Snyder
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2006-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Intact Hedonic Responses to Sweet Tastes in Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  Cara R Damiano; Joseph Aloi; Caley Burrus; James C Garbutt; Alexei B Kampov-Polevoy; Gabriel S Dichter
Journal:  Res Autism Spectr Disord       Date:  2014-03

8.  Measures of individual differences in taste and creaminess perception.

Authors:  Juyun Lim; Lenka Urban; Barry G Green
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2008-05-03       Impact factor: 3.160

9.  Reliability of Threshold and Suprathreshold Methods for Taste Phenotyping: Characterization with PROP and Sodium Chloride.

Authors:  Veronica Galindo-Cuspinera; Thierry Waeber; Nicolas Antille; Christoph Hartmann; Nicola Stead; Nathalie Martin
Journal:  Chemosens Percept       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 1.833

10.  Genetic and molecular basis of individual differences in human umami taste perception.

Authors:  Noriatsu Shigemura; Shinya Shirosaki; Keisuke Sanematsu; Ryusuke Yoshida; Yuzo Ninomiya
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-08-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.