Literature DB >> 10943269

Ductal carcinoma in situ. Implications for screening mammography.

S A Feig1.   

Abstract

Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) now represents 20% of all newly diagnosed breast cancers because of increased detection by screening mammography. Twenty year relative survival rates are 97%. Postsurgical and histological studies and recent molecular biological studies indicate that most cases of DCIS will progress to invasive carcinoma if not detected by mammography. Screening mammography studies support the need for annual versus less frequent screenings to detect DCIS before further progression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10943269     DOI: 10.1016/s0033-8389(05)70192-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0033-8389            Impact factor:   2.303


  12 in total

1.  Role of ultrasound and sonographically guided core biopsy in the diagnostic evaluation of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast.

Authors:  V Londero; C Zuiani; A Furlan; J Nori; M Bazzocchi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2007-09-20       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Differences in radiological patterns, tumour characteristics and diagnostic precision between digital mammography and screen-film mammography in four breast cancer screening programmes in Spain.

Authors:  Laia Domingo; Anabel Romero; Francesc Belvis; Mar Sánchez; Joana Ferrer; Dolores Salas; Josefa Ibáñez; Alfonso Vega; Francesc Ferrer; M Soledad Laso; Francesc Macià; Xavier Castells; Maria Sala
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Effects of breast cancer surgery and surgical side effects on body image over time.

Authors:  Karen Kadela Collins; Ying Liu; Mario Schootman; Rebecca Aft; Yan Yan; Grace Dean; Mark Eilers; Donna B Jeffe
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Benefits and harms of mammography screening after age 74 years: model estimates of overdiagnosis.

Authors:  Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; Natasha K Stout; Clyde B Schechter; Eveline A M Heijnsdijk; Oguzhan Alagoz; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Harry J de Koning
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 5.  Modern concepts of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and its diagnosis through percutaneous biopsy.

Authors:  Ute Kettritz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  False positive mammograms and detection controlled estimation.

Authors:  Andrew N Kleit; James F Ruiz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Full-field digital mammography compared to screen film mammography in the prevalent round of a population-based screening programme: the Vestfold County Study.

Authors:  Einar Vigeland; Herman Klaasen; Tor Audun Klingen; Solveig Hofvind; Per Skaane
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  Regular self-examination or clinical examination for early detection of breast cancer.

Authors:  J P Kösters; P C Gøtzsche
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2003

Review 9.  Interpreting overdiagnosis estimates in population-based mammography screening.

Authors:  Rianne de Gelder; Eveline A M Heijnsdijk; Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; Jacques Fracheboud; Gerrit Draisma; Harry J de Koning
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 6.222

10.  Pitfalls in accurate estimation of overdiagnosis: implications for screening policy and compliance.

Authors:  Stephen A Feig
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.