P Warrick1, C Dromey, J C Irish, L Durkin, A Pakiam, A Lang. 1. Department of Otolaryngology, Toronto General Hospital/Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To evaluate the relative efficacy of unilateral and bilateral injections of botulinum toxin injection (BOTOX) in the treatment of essential tremor of the voice (ETV). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective open-label crossover study. METHODS:Patients referred to the Neurolaryngology Clinic at Toronto General Hospital with a diagnosis of ETV were eligible for the study. Patients were sequentially assigned to receive BOTOX as either a bilateral 2.5-U or a unilateral 15-U electromyography-guided injection, followed by the alternative injection 16 to 18 weeks later. Acoustic, aerodynamic, and nasopharyngoscopic data were collected approximately 2, 6, 10, and 16 weeks after each injection. Patients were asked to provide a perceptual evaluation of BOTOX effects at the conclusion of the study. RESULTS: Three of 10 patients demonstrated an objective reduction in tremor severity with bilateral injection, and 2 of 9 with unilateral injection. However, 8 of 10 patients wished to be re-injected at the conclusion of the study. A reduction in vocal effort appeared to be coincident with reduction in laryngeal airway resistance after BOTOX injection. CONCLUSIONS: Using objective acoustic measures, only a small proportion of patients achieved benefit from BOTOX injection for ETV. However, a majority of patients in our study benefited from a subjective reduction in vocal effort that may have been attributable to reduced laryngeal airway resistance.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To evaluate the relative efficacy of unilateral and bilateral injections of botulinum toxin injection (BOTOX) in the treatment of essential tremor of the voice (ETV). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective open-label crossover study. METHODS:Patients referred to the Neurolaryngology Clinic at Toronto General Hospital with a diagnosis of ETV were eligible for the study. Patients were sequentially assigned to receive BOTOX as either a bilateral 2.5-U or a unilateral 15-U electromyography-guided injection, followed by the alternative injection 16 to 18 weeks later. Acoustic, aerodynamic, and nasopharyngoscopic data were collected approximately 2, 6, 10, and 16 weeks after each injection. Patients were asked to provide a perceptual evaluation of BOTOX effects at the conclusion of the study. RESULTS: Three of 10 patients demonstrated an objective reduction in tremor severity with bilateral injection, and 2 of 9 with unilateral injection. However, 8 of 10 patients wished to be re-injected at the conclusion of the study. A reduction in vocal effort appeared to be coincident with reduction in laryngeal airway resistance after BOTOX injection. CONCLUSIONS: Using objective acoustic measures, only a small proportion of patients achieved benefit from BOTOX injection for ETV. However, a majority of patients in our study benefited from a subjective reduction in vocal effort that may have been attributable to reduced laryngeal airway resistance.
Authors: Priyesh N Patel; Edmond K Kabagambe; Jennifer C Starkweather; Matthew Keller; Vahram Gamsarian; Jane Lee; Vishnutheert Kulkarni; C Gaelyn Garrett; David O Francis Journal: JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg Date: 2018-04-01 Impact factor: 6.223
Authors: Dietrich Haubenberger; Giovanni Abbruzzese; Peter G Bain; Nin Bajaj; Julián Benito-León; Kailash P Bhatia; Günther Deuschl; Maria João Forjaz; Mark Hallett; Elan D Louis; Kelly E Lyons; Tiago A Mestre; Jan Raethjen; Maria Stamelou; Eng-King Tan; Claudia M Testa; Rodger J Elble Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2016-06-06 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Soren Y Lowell; Richard T Kelley; Marika Monahan; Carly Jo Hosbach-Cannon; Raymond H Colton; Dragos Mihaila Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2018-12-25 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Kelly E Lyons; Rajesh Pahwa; Cynthia L Comella; Mahmood S Eisa; Rodger J Elble; Stanley Fahn; Joseph Jankovic; Jorge L Juncos; William C Koller; William G Ondo; Kapil D Sethi; Matthew B Stern; Caroline M Tanner; Ron Tintner; Ray L Watts Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2003 Impact factor: 5.606
Authors: D M Simpson; A Blitzer; A Brashear; C Comella; R Dubinsky; M Hallett; J Jankovic; B Karp; C L Ludlow; J M Miyasaki; M Naumann; Y So Journal: Neurology Date: 2008-05-06 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Mario Zappia; Alberto Albanese; Elisa Bruno; Carlo Colosimo; Graziella Filippini; Paolo Martinelli; Alessandra Nicoletti; Graziella Quattrocchi; Giovanni Abbruzzese; Alfredo Berardelli; Roberta Allegra; Maria Stella Aniello; Antonio E Elia; Davide Martino; Daniela Murgia; Marina Picillo; Giovanna Squintani Journal: J Neurol Date: 2012-08-11 Impact factor: 4.849