Literature DB >> 10940171

Attitudes of neonatal clinicians towards resuscitation of the extremely premature infant: an exploratory survey.

J Oei1, L M Askie, R Tobiansky, K Lui.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore the current attitudes of Australian neonatologists and nurses towards the resuscitation of extremely preterm infants.
METHODOLOGY: An anonymous questionnaire regarding resuscitation of infants of less than 28 weeks gestation was sent to all neonatologists and three registered nurses in each perinatal centre in Australia.
RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-three questionnaires were sent. A return rate of 93% and 73% was obtained from neonatologists and nurses, respectively. Twenty-two per cent of neonatologists would 'occasionally' resuscitate at 22 weeks while none of the nurses would. A considerable proportion of neonatologists (23%) but only a few nurses (6%) would 'quite often' resuscitate 23-week infants. The majority of neonatologists (85%) and nurses (88%) would 'almost always' resuscitate 24 week infants. More than half of the respondents would 'occasionally' resuscitate a 400-499 g infant and most would resuscitate infants weighing more than 500 g. Clinicians were not as optimistic of long-term outcome as they were for survival. Typically, only 52% of neonatologists and 38% of nurses thought babies of 25 weeks gestation had a greater than 50% chance of survival without major handicap. Parental wishes and the presence of congenital abnormalities were major influences on decision to resuscitate. Hypothetically, most respondents, more doctors than nurses, would consider initiating resuscitation without parental consent at a median gestation of 25 weeks.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of Australian clinicians would resuscitate at a gestation of 24 weeks or greater or at a birth weight of over 500 g despite conservative estimates of intact survival. This survey has brought to light the importance of communication with parents prior to extreme premature birth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10940171     DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1754.2000.00517.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Paediatr Child Health        ISSN: 1034-4810            Impact factor:   1.954


  6 in total

1.  Divergent views of hope influencing communications between parents and hospital providers.

Authors:  Cecelia I Roscigno; Teresa A Savage; Karen Kavanaugh; Teresa T Moro; Sarah J Kilpatrick; Howard T Strassner; William A Grobman; Robert E Kimura
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2012-06-28

Review 2.  Challenging nurses' cultural competence of disability to improve interpersonal interactions.

Authors:  Cecelia I Roscigno
Journal:  J Neurosci Nurs       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.230

3.  Outcomes of neonates with birth weight⩽500 g: a 20-year experience.

Authors:  K Upadhyay; M Pourcyrous; R Dhanireddy; A J Talati
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 2.521

4.  Negativity about the outcomes of extreme prematurity a persistent problem - a survey of health care professionals across the North Queensland region.

Authors:  Susan Ireland; Sarah Larkins; Robin Ray; Lynn Woodward
Journal:  Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol       Date:  2020-04-28

5.  Exploring implicit bias in the perceived consequences of prematurity amongst health care providers in North Queensland - a constructivist grounded theory study.

Authors:  Susan Ireland; Robin Ray; Sarah Larkins; Lynn Woodward
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 6.  Factors influencing the care provided for periviable babies in Australia: a narrative review.

Authors:  Susan Ireland; Robin Ray; Sarah Larkins; Lynn Woodward
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 3.223

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.