Literature DB >> 10940130

Effects of the revised HCFA evaluation and management guidelines on inpatient teaching.

S D Fihn1, A M Schleyer, H Kelly-Hedrick, D B Martin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In 1996, the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) introduced new evaluation and management (E&M) guidelines mandating more intensive supervision and documentation by attending physicians. We assessed the effects of the guidelines on inpatient teaching.
DESIGN: Pretest-posttest, nonequivalent control group design.
SETTING: A university hospital and an affiliated county hospital where the guidelines were implemented and an affiliated VA medical center where they were not. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-one full-time faculty who had attended on the general medical wards for at least 1 month for 2 of 3 consecutive years prior to July 1996 and for at least 1 month during the 18 following months.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We evaluated standardized, confidential evaluations of attending physicians that are routinely completed by residents and students after clinical rotations at all three sites. Comparing 863 evaluations completed before July 1, 1996 and 497 completed after that date, there were no significant differences at any of the hospitals on any items assessed. There were also no differences between the university and county hospitals as compared with the VA. Eighty-seven percent of 39 university and county attending physicians returned a survey about their perceptions of inpatient teaching activities before and after July 1, 1996. They reported highly significant increases in time devoted to attending responsibilities but diminished time spent on teaching activities.
CONCLUSIONS: Physicians reported a dramatic increase in overall time spent attending but a decrease in time spent teaching following implementation of the revised E&M guidelines. Yet, evaluations of their teaching effectiveness did not change.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10940130      PMCID: PMC1495480          DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.07001.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  6 in total

1.  Evaluation and management guidelines--fatally flawed.

Authors:  J P Kassirer; M Angell
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-12-03       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Attributes of excellent attending-physician role models.

Authors:  S M Wright; D E Kern; K Kolodner; D M Howard; F L Brancati
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-12-31       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Factors affecting ratings of clinical teachers by medical students and residents.

Authors:  D M Irby; G M Gillmore; P G Ramsey
Journal:  J Med Educ       Date:  1987-01

4.  Evaluating clinical teaching in the medicine clerkship: relationship of instructor experience and training setting to ratings of teaching effectiveness.

Authors:  P G Ramsey; G M Gillmore; D M Irby
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1988 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Evaluation of clinical teaching by general internal medicine faculty in outpatient and inpatient settings.

Authors:  M T Ramsbottom-Lucier; G M Gillmore; D M Irby; P G Ramsey
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 6.893

6.  An observational study of attending rounds.

Authors:  M Miller; B Johnson; H L Greene; M Baier; S Nowlin
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.128

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Time, autonomy, and satisfaction.

Authors:  R M Epstein
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Hospitalists as teachers.

Authors:  Sunil Kripalani; Allison C Pope; Kimberly Rask; Kimberly Hunt; Daniel D Dressler; William T Branch; Rebecca Zhang; Mark V Williams
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.128

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.