Literature DB >> 10938915

Limiting factors on the transformative powers of e-mail in patient-physician relationships: a critical analysis.

C Baur1.   

Abstract

In this article I analyze doctor-patient use of e-mail within the context of the evolving doctor-patient relationship and ongoing changes in the U.S. health care system. Evidence from the published literature on doctor-patient relationships and doctor-patient communication, empirical studies of uses of the Internet by doctors and patients, and commentaries about the Internet's role in health care are examined and discussed to reveal common, unsupported assumptions about the likely impact of e-mail on the doctor-patient relationship and also the value structure associated with current e-mail practices between doctors and patients. I argue that existing research does not adequately account for the technical, professional, and economic forces that are shaping doctor-patient use of e-mail. I conclude that physicians' preferences for technical, instrumental exchanges with patients will likely mitigate the positive influence that e-mail could have on the doctor-patient relationship, and doctor-patient communication is unlikely to improve as a result of their use of e-mail.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10938915     DOI: 10.1207/S15327027HC1203_02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Commun        ISSN: 1041-0236


  17 in total

1.  Predictors and Effects of Training on an Online Health Education and Support System for Women with Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Helene McDowell; Eunkyung Kim; Bret R Shaw; Jeong Yeob Han; Lauren Gumieny
Journal:  J Comput Mediat Commun       Date:  2010-04

2.  Twenty-first Century Bedside Manner: Exploring Patient-Centered Communication in Secure Messaging with Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Jordan M Alpert; Merry Jennifer Markham; Ragnhildur I Bjarnadottir; Carma L Bylund
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Internet-Based Interactive Support for Cancer Patients: Are Integrated Systems Better?

Authors:  David H Gustafson; Robert Hawkins; Fiona McTavish; Suzanne Pingree; Wei Chih Chen; Kanittha Volrathongchai; William Stengle; James A Stewart; Ronald C Serlin
Journal:  J Commun       Date:  2008-06

4.  Physicians' use of and attitudes toward electronic mail for patient communication.

Authors:  Barak Gaster; Christopher L Knight; Dawn E DeWitt; John V L Sheffield; Nassim P Assefi; Dedra Buchwald
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  "You are not at all bothersome" - nurses' online communication with testicular cancer patients.

Authors:  Torunn Wibe; Mirjam Ekstedt; Ragnhild Hellesø; Cecilie Varsi; Cornelia Ruland
Journal:  NI 2012 (2012)       Date:  2012-06-23

6.  A content analysis of e-mail communication between patients and their providers: patients get the message.

Authors:  Casey B White; Cheryl A Moyer; David T Stern; Steven J Katz
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004-04-02       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  Effect of a triage-based E-mail system on clinic resource use and patient and physician satisfaction in primary care: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Steven J Katz; Cheryl A Moyer; Douglas T Cox; David T Stern
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  The personal health record paradox: health care professionals' perspectives and the information ecology of personal health record systems in organizational and clinical settings.

Authors:  Kim M Nazi
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 5.428

9.  How does an online patient-nurse communication service meet the information needs of men with recently diagnosed testicular cancer?

Authors:  Torunn Wibe; Ragnhild Hellesø; Cecilie Varsi; Cornelia Ruland; Mirjam Ekstedt
Journal:  ISRN Nurs       Date:  2012-12-04

10.  Doctors who are using e-mail with their patients: a qualitative exploration.

Authors:  Madhavi R Patt; Thomas K Houston; Mollie W Jenckes; Daniel Z Sands; Daniel E Ford
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2003 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.