Literature DB >> 10937632

Femoral structure and stiffness in patients with femoral neck fracture.

D D Cody1, F J Hou, G W Divine, D P Fyhrie.   

Abstract

Bone morphological characteristics may relate to the risk of hip fracture. We applied finite element modeling to radiologic data for two groups of women in vivo to address two questions: (a) Do individuals who have just sustained a femoral neck fracture exhibit reduced three-dimensional structural stiffness? and (b) Are victims of hip fracture disproportionately more susceptible to loads sustained in a fall than to stance-type loads? Ten white women (age: 64-76 years) who had just sustained a femoral neck fracture and 18 female volunteers (age: 65-76 years), matched as groups for race, age. and body mass index, were evaluated. From quantitative computed tomography scans, femoral morphometric and volumetric cancellous density measurements were obtained and a finite element model was constructed. Two load conditions were simulated: single-stance phase and lateral fall. Global stiffness values were determined for each model. The cancellous bone density was significantly lower at the femoral neck and the femoral neck and head diameters were significantly larger in the women in the fracture group than in those in the control group. The stiffness of the proximal femur did not differ significantly between the groups for either load condition. An apparently linear relationship was found for stiffness at stance load compared with stiffness at fall load (r = 0.84, p < 0.001). and slopes did not differ significantly between the groups. Although cancellous density was reduced at the fracture site in patients with femoral neck fractures. this did not result in a reduction in the predicted bone stiffness. Previous studies have established a very strong relationship between the stiffness and strength of bone. Since these modeling methods were thoroughly validated ex vivo, we conclude that although decreased bone density at the femoral neck may predict where fracture initiates, the risk of hip fracture per se may be more strongly dependent on issues such as the risk of falling and fall biomechanics than on the structural characteristics of bone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10937632     DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100180317

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  10 in total

1.  Comparison of femoral morphology and bone mineral density between femoral neck fractures and trochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Yuki Maeda; Nobuhiko Sugano; Masanobu Saito; Kazuo Yonenobu
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-08-20       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  A biomechanical perspective on bone quality.

Authors:  C J Hernandez; T M Keaveny
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-07-28       Impact factor: 4.398

3.  Bivariate linkage study of proximal hip geometry and body size indices: the Framingham study.

Authors:  D Karasik; J Dupuis; L A Cupples; T J Beck; M C Mahaney; L M Havill; D P Kiel; S Demissie
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2007-08-03       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 4.  Extending DXA beyond bone mineral density: understanding hip structure analysis.

Authors:  Thomas J Beck
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.096

5.  Considerations for development of surrogate endpoints for antifracture efficacy of new treatments in osteoporosis: a perspective.

Authors:  Mary L Bouxsein; Pierre D Delmas
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Can Recovery Foot Placement Affect Older Adults' Slip-Fall Severity?

Authors:  Shuaijie Wang; Xuan Liu; Anna Lee; Yi-Chung Pai
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  Differences in hip quantitative computed tomography (QCT) measurements of bone mineral density and bone strength between glucocorticoid-treated and glucocorticoid-naive postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Kuo-Chiang Lian; Thomas F Lang; Joyce H Keyak; Gunnard W Modin; Qaisar Rehman; Loi Do; Nancy E Lane
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-09-28       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Femoral bone strength and its relation to cortical and trabecular changes after treatment with PTH, alendronate, and their combination as assessed by finite element analysis of quantitative CT scans.

Authors:  Tony M Keaveny; Paul F Hoffmann; Mandeep Singh; Lisa Palermo; John P Bilezikian; Susan L Greenspan; Dennis M Black
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  The role of hip and chest radiographs in osteoporotic evaluation among south Indian women population: a comparative scenario with DXA.

Authors:  D Ashok Kumar; M Anburajan
Journal:  J Endocrinol Invest       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 4.256

10.  Application of multidimensional interpolation on nonhomogeneous cancellous bone.

Authors:  Sikai Liu; Sheng Li; Ning Wei; Wenli Chang; Pan Hu; Xiaodong Cheng; Ling Wang; Wei Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.817

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.