Literature DB >> 20490554

What is the utilization of the SAGES guidelines by its members?

Dimitrios Stefanidis1, William S Richardson, Robert D Fanelli.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The development and implementation of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines involves many challenges. The Society of the American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) has been at the forefront of guideline development for laparoscopic surgery since 1991, providing its membership with guidelines on the clinical application of procedures and the granting of privileges. The objective of this study was to assess the use of SAGES guidelines by its members.
METHODS: An electronic survey of SAGES members was conducted via e-mail in August 2007. Members were asked if they used the guidelines, how often, for what purposes and when, and to rank the frequency of use and the usefulness of each of the 26 guidelines. They also were asked to suggest topics for new guideline development and to provide comments.
RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-nine SAGES members (4.1%) responded to the survey; 121 (50%) responders used the guidelines. Of these, 95% accessed the guidelines monthly or less often, 58% after hours, 52% during work hours, and 9% while on call. Reasons for guideline use included developing practice protocols (56%) and patient treatment paradigms (51%), creating education and training guidelines for staff privileges (35%), and credentialing new medical staff (25%). The most often used and most useful guidelines included clinical application guidelines on laparoscopic bariatric, antireflux, biliary, and colorectal surgery, laparoscopic appendectomy, and deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis. Some respondents indicated no knowledge of guideline existence and made requests for new guidelines.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this survey provided valuable information about current use of SAGES guidelines by its members. The pattern of use highlights the need for interventions that increase member awareness and adoption of these guidelines. Such efforts are currently underway.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20490554     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-1117-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  19 in total

1.  Improving clinical practice guidelines for the 21st century. Attitudinal barriers and not technology are the main challenges.

Authors:  G P Browman
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.188

2.  Perspectives on the value of American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical guidelines as reported by oncologists and health maintenance organizations.

Authors:  Charles L Bennett; Mark R Somerfield; David G Pfister; Cecilia Tomori; Sofia Yakren; Peter B Bach
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Variations among high volume surgeons in the rate of complications after radical prostatectomy: further evidence that technique matters.

Authors:  Fernando J Bianco; Elyn R Riedel; Colin B Begg; Michael W Kattan; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Evaluating best practice guidelines.

Authors:  Nancy Edwards; Barbara Davies; Jenny Ploeg; Maureen Dobbins; Jennifer Skelly; Pat Griffin; Sylvia Ralphs-Thibodeau
Journal:  Can Nurse       Date:  2005-02

5.  Current challenges in adherence to clinical guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery.

Authors:  Sohail Ahmad Khan; Gabrial Rodrigues; Pramod Kumar; Padma G M Rao
Journal:  J Coll Physicians Surg Pak       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 0.711

6.  Agreement between surgeons and an independent panel with respect to surgical site fusion after single-level anterior cervical spine surgery: a prospective, multicenter study.

Authors:  Richard L Skolasky; Anica M Maggard; Alan S Hilibrand; Bruce E Northrup; Christopher G Ullrich; Todd J Albert; Jeffrey D Coe; Lee H Riley
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Variations in morbidity after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Colin B Begg; Elyn R Riedel; Peter B Bach; Michael W Kattan; Deborah Schrag; Joan L Warren; Peter T Scardino
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Developing and implementing clinical guidelines: lessons from the NICE schizophrenia guideline.

Authors:  Stephen Pilling; Katy Price
Journal:  Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc       Date:  2006 Apr-Jun

9.  Compliance to consensus recommendations, surgeon's experience, and introduction of a quality assurance and management program: influence on therapy of early-stage ovarian carcinoma.

Authors:  Stefan Kommoss; Philipp Harter; Alexander Traut; Deivis Strutas; Nina Riegler; Christine Buhrmann; Ruth Gomez; Andreas du Bois
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.437

10.  Prevention of venous thromboembolism: improving practice in surgical patients.

Authors:  G S McKenna; A Karthikesalingam; S R Walsh; T Y Tang; C R Quick
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 6.071

View more
  2 in total

1.  How do SAGES members rate its guidelines?

Authors:  William W Hope; William Richardson; Robert Fanelli; Dimitrios Stefanidis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Use and usefulness of guidelines for sickness certification: results from a national survey of all general practitioners in Sweden.

Authors:  Ylva Skånér; Gunnar H Nilsson; Britt Arrelöv; Christina Lindholm; Elin Hinas; Anna Löfgren Wilteus; Kristina Alexanderson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.