Literature DB >> 10930825

Accurate calculation of the density of proteins.

M L Quillin1, B W Matthews.   

Abstract

On the basis of theoretical calculations, Andersson & Hovmöller have recently suggested that the long-established value of 1.35 g cm(-3) for the mean density of proteins should be revised to 1.22 g cm(-3) [Andersson & Hovmöller (2000), Acta Cryst. D56, 789-790]. To substantiate their assertion, these authors used the Voronoi algorithm to calculate the mean atomic volume for 30 representative protein structures. The Voronoi procedure requires that atoms of interest be bounded on all sides by other atoms. Volume calculations for surface atoms that are not surrounded or are only sparsely surrounded by other atoms either are not possible or may be unreliable. In an attempt to circumvent this problem, Andersson & Hovmöller rejected atoms with calculated volumes that were indeterminate or were greater than 50 A(3). In the present study, it is shown that this criterion is not sufficiently restrictive to ensure accurate volume determinations. When only strictly buried atoms are included in the volume calculations using the Voronoi algorithm, the mean density is found to be 1.47 +/- 0.05 g cm(-3). In addition, an alternate procedure based on the Connolly algorithm that permits all protein atoms to be included in volume calculations gives 1.43 +/- 0.03 g cm(-3) for the mean density of the same set of proteins. The latter two calculated values are mutually consistent and are in better agreement with the experimental value.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10930825     DOI: 10.1107/s090744490000679x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr        ISSN: 0907-4449


  70 in total

1.  Some thermodynamic implications for the thermostability of proteins.

Authors:  D C Rees; A D Robertson
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Protein stability in mixed solvents: a balance of contact interaction and excluded volume.

Authors:  John A Schellman
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Matthews coefficient probabilities: Improved estimates for unit cell contents of proteins, DNA, and protein-nucleic acid complex crystals.

Authors:  Katherine A Kantardjieff; Bernhard Rupp
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Average protein density is a molecular-weight-dependent function.

Authors:  Hannes Fischer; Igor Polikarpov; Aldo F Craievich
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Magnetic levitation as a platform for competitive protein-ligand binding assays.

Authors:  Nathan D Shapiro; Siowling Soh; Katherine A Mirica; George M Whitesides
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  Cryoelectron tomography reveals doublet-specific structures and unique interactions in the I1 dynein.

Authors:  Thomas Heuser; Cynthia F Barber; Jianfeng Lin; Jeremy Krell; Matthew Rebesco; Mary E Porter; Daniela Nicastro
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Cell Walls and the Convergent Evolution of the Viral Envelope.

Authors:  Jan P Buchmann; Edward C Holmes
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 11.056

8.  Internal structure and visualization of transmembrane domains of the RyR1 calcium release channel by cryo-EM.

Authors:  Montserrat Samsó; Terence Wagenknecht; P D Allen
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2005-05-22       Impact factor: 15.369

9.  The FKBP12 subunit modifies the long-range allosterism of the ryanodine receptor.

Authors:  Tyler W E Steele; Montserrat Samsó
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 2.867

10.  Absolute Amounts and Status of the Nrf2-Keap1-Cul3 Complex within Cells.

Authors:  Tatsuro Iso; Takafumi Suzuki; Liam Baird; Masayuki Yamamoto
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 4.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.