Literature DB >> 10928639

Neuroanatomic substrates of lower extremity somatosensory evoked potentials.

T Yamada1.   

Abstract

After stimulation of the lower extremity nerve (tibial nerve), N21 and N23 are recorded from L4 and T12 spine respectively. The far-field potentials of P31 and N35 are registered from Fpz-C5s (fifth cervical spine) or CPi (ipsilateral with respect to the side of stimulation)-ear derivation. Additional far-field potentials of P17 and P24 may be recorded from the scalp when a noncephalic (knee) reference is used. The major positive peak, P40, is registered at the vertex and the CPi. Preceding P40, there is a small negative peak, N37, recorded at the contralateral (CPc) hemisphere. Neuroanatomic substrates of these somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) components are less well clarified compared with those of upper extremity (median nerve) SSEPs, primarily because clinical application of lower extremity SSEPs is more difficult, and all of the aforementioned potentials but one (P40) are not obligatory components. The concept of "paradoxical lateralization" complicates the issue further. Accumulating evidence, however, suggests that the far-field potentials of P17 and P31 arise from the distal portion of the sacral plexus and brainstem respectively. These correspond to P9 and P14 of the median nerve SSEPs respectively. The spinal potential of N23 is equivalent to the N13 cervical potential of the median nerve SSEP. N35 recorded from the ipsilateral hemisphere is analogous to N18 of the median nerve. Paradoxically lateralized P40 has been thought to represent the positive end of a dipole field, reflected by the negativity at the mesial surface of the contralateral hemisphere, and has commonly been considered to be equivalent to the first cortical potentials (N20) of the median nerve SSEP. However, more recent evidence suggests that the primary positivity is at the mesial cortical surface, and it more likely corresponds to P26 of the median nerve SSEP. Thus the first cortical potential corresponding to N20 is probably a small and inconsistent N37 recorded on the contralateral hemisphere. These assumptions need to be verified further by more extensive clinical studies applied to various neurologic disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10928639     DOI: 10.1097/00004691-200005000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0736-0258            Impact factor:   2.177


  9 in total

1.  Intraoperative monitoring using somatosensory evoked potentials. A position statement by the American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring.

Authors:  J Richard Toleikis
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 2.  Application of electrophysiological measures in spinal cord injury clinical trials: a narrative review.

Authors:  Michèle Hubli; John L K Kramer; Catherine R Jutzeler; Jan Rosner; Julio C Furlan; Keith E Tansey; Martin Schubert
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 2.772

3.  Comparison of brainstem reflex recordings and evoked potentials with clinical and MRI data to assess brainstem dysfunction in multiple sclerosis: a short-term follow-up.

Authors:  I Magnano; G M Pes; M P Cabboi; G Pilurzi; F Ginatempo; A Achene; A Salis; M Conti; Franca Deriu
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 3.307

4.  Dipole source analyses of early median nerve SEP components obtained from subdural grid recordings.

Authors:  Ulf Baumgärtner; Hagen Vogel; Shinji Ohara; Rolf-Detlef Treede; Fred A Lenz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Timing-dependent plasticity in human primary somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Alexander Wolters; Arne Schmidt; Axel Schramm; Daniel Zeller; Markus Naumann; Erwin Kunesch; Reiner Benecke; Karlheinz Reiners; Joseph Classen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-04-21       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 6.  Current approach on spinal cord monitoring: the point of view of the neurologist, the anesthesiologist and the spine surgeon.

Authors:  Thomas N Pajewski; Vincent Arlet; Lawrence H Phillips
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Lumbar spinal stenosis: assessment of cauda equina involvement by electrophysiological recordings.

Authors:  D Egli; O Hausmann; M Schmid; N Boos; V Dietz; A Curt
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Paired Associative Stimulation Targeting the Tibialis Anterior Muscle using either Mono or Biphasic Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Natalie Mrachacz-Kersting; Andrew J T Stevenson
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  SEP Montage Variability Comparison during Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoring.

Authors:  Christine Hanson; Athena Maria Lolis; Aleksandar Beric
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 4.003

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.