Literature DB >> 10927119

The use of an implicit standard for measuring discrimination thresholds.

M J Morgan1, S N Watamaniuk, S P McKee.   

Abstract

We measured thresholds for comparing the separation between lines, using either the method of constant stimuli (MCS) or the method of single stimuli (MSS). In the MCS an explicit standard is presented on each trial, whereas in the MSS the standard is the mean of the set. The thresholds for the MSS procedure were nearly identical to those with the MCS procedure, whether or not feedback was used. A statistical model is presented showing how the threshold error estimated by MSS varies according to the number of past stimuli used by the observer to calculate the mean of the set. If the model is an accurate representation of human processing, our observers were averaging over the last 10-20 trials to estimate the implicit standard. Our results show that the explicit standard in the MCS procedure is generally superfluous. Provided that the test range is small, and that the observer is given some practice trials, thresholds measured with MSS procedure are just as precise as those measured with the traditional MCS procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10927119     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00093-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  49 in total

1.  Natural-scene statistics predict how the figure-ground cue of convexity affects human depth perception.

Authors:  Johannes Burge; Charless C Fowlkes; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Slow updating of the achromatic point after a change in illumination.

Authors:  Robert J Lee; Kathryn A Dawson; Hannah E Smithson
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Systematic distortions of perceptual stability investigated using immersive virtual reality.

Authors:  Lili Tcheang; Stuart J Gilson; Andrew Glennerster
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 4.  Sensory, computational and cognitive components of human colour constancy.

Authors:  H E Smithson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2005-06-29       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Stereo sensitivity depends on stereo matching.

Authors:  Suzanne P McKee; Preeti Verghese; Bart Farell
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Effects of nonspatial selective and divided visual attention on fMRI BOLD responses.

Authors:  Riklef Weerda; Ignacio Vallines; James P Thomas; Roland M Rutschmann; Mark W Greenlee
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-03-09       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Reverse hierarchies and sensory learning.

Authors:  Merav Ahissar; Mor Nahum; Israel Nelken; Shaul Hochstein
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  From comparison to classification: a cortical tool for boosting perception.

Authors:  Mor Nahum; Luba Daikhin; Yedida Lubin; Yamit Cohen; Merav Ahissar
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Bias and sensitivity in two-interval forced choice procedures: Tests of the difference model.

Authors:  Yaffa Yeshurun; Marisa Carrasco; Laurence T Maloney
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Symmetry-based methodology for decision-rule identification in same--different experiments.

Authors:  Alexander A Petrov
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.