Literature DB >> 10925821

Objective monitoring of physical activity using motion sensors and heart rate.

P S Freedson1, K Miller.   

Abstract

Although neither motion sensors nor heart rate are perfect markers of physical activity, they certainly eliminate subjectivity of obtaining physical activity information. The objective method of choice depends on how the measurement will be used. For example, if walking behavior is the desired outcome, then a pedometer may be sufficient. If patterns and intensity of activity over longer periods of times such as a week or longer are needed, then an accelerometer with large memory capacity should be selected. In the future, efforts should be directed towards developing an objective motion sensor as inexpensive as a pedometer but with the data acquisition capabilities of the CSA or Tritrac accelerometer. Providing simultaneous heart rate with motion is also recommended to further verify that elevated heart rate does in fact represent a physical activity response. As the cost of the electronic components continues to decrease, these activity monitor configurations may become possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10925821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport        ISSN: 0270-1367            Impact factor:   2.500


  56 in total

1.  The faith, activity, and nutrition (FAN) program: design of a participatory research intervention to increase physical activity and improve dietary habits in African American churches.

Authors:  Sara Wilcox; Marilyn Laken; Allen W Parrott; Margaret Condrasky; Ruth Saunders; Cheryl L Addy; Rebecca Evans; Meghan Baruth; May Samuel
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 2.  Physical activity questionnaires for youth: a systematic review of measurement properties.

Authors:  Mai J M Chinapaw; Lidwine B Mokkink; Mireille N M van Poppel; Willem van Mechelen; Caroline B Terwee
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Analysis and Interpretation of Accelerometry Data in Older Adults: The LIFE Study.

Authors:  W Jack Rejeski; Anthony P Marsh; Peter H Brubaker; Matthew Buman; Roger A Fielding; Don Hire; Todd Manini; Alvito Rego; Michael E Miller
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 6.053

Review 4.  Prescribing exercise as preventive therapy.

Authors:  Darren E R Warburton; Crystal Whitney Nicol; Shannon S D Bredin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2006-03-28       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Using three objective criteria to examine pedometer guidelines for free-living individuals.

Authors:  Duncan James Macfarlane; Dionise Chan; K L Chan; Edmond Y K Ho; Cherry C Y Lee
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 6.  Validity of self-reported mechanical demands for occupational epidemiologic research of musculoskeletal disorders.

Authors:  Lope H Barrero; Jeffrey N Katz; Jack T Dennerlein
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.024

7.  Different methods for monitoring intensity during water-based aerobic exercises.

Authors:  C Raffaelli; C Galvani; M Lanza; Paola Zamparo
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Covariation of adolescent physical activity and dietary behaviors over 12 months.

Authors:  Dori E Rosenberg; Gregory J Norman; James F Sallis; Karen J Calfas; Kevin Patrick
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 5.012

9.  Recent advances in free-living physical activity monitoring: a review.

Authors:  David Andre; Donna L Wolf
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2007-09

10.  Practical guide to measuring physical activity.

Authors:  Louisa G Sylvia; Emily E Bernstein; Jane L Hubbard; Leigh Keating; Ellen J Anderson
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 4.910

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.