Literature DB >> 10924455

Genetic analysis of the role of Pol II holoenzyme components in repression by the Cyc8-Tup1 corepressor in yeast.

M Lee1, S Chatterjee, K Struhl.   

Abstract

The Cyc8-Tup1 corepressor complex is targeted to promoters by pathway-specific DNA-binding repressors, thereby inhibiting the transcription of specific classes of genes. Genetic screens have identified mutations in a variety of Pol II holoenzyme components (Srb8, Srb9, Srb10, Srb11, Sin4, Rgr1, Rox3, and Hrs1) and in the N-terminal tails of histones H3 and H4 that weaken repression by Cyc8-Tup1. Here, we analyze the effect of individual and multiple mutations in many of these components on transcriptional repression of natural promoters that are regulated by Cyc8-Tup1. In all cases tested, individual mutations have a very modest effect on SUC2 RNA levels and no detectable effect on levels of ANB1, MFA2, and RNR2. Furthermore, multiple mutations within the Srb components, between Srbs and Sin4, and between Srbs and histone tails affect Cyc8-Tup1 repression to the same modest extent as the individual mutations. These results argue that the weak effects of the various mutations on repression by Cyc8-Tup1 are not due to redundancy among components of the Pol II machinery, and they argue against a simple redundancy between the holoenzyme and chromatin pathways. In addition, phenotypic analysis indicates that, although Srbs8-11 are indistinguishable with respect to Cyc8-Tup1 repression, the individual Srbs are functionally distinct in other respects. Genetic interactions among srb mutations imply that a balance between the activities of Srb8 + Srb10 and Srb11 is important for normal cell growth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10924455      PMCID: PMC1461184     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  44 in total

1.  Amino termini of histones H3 and H4 are required for a1-alpha2 repression in yeast.

Authors:  L Huang; W Zhang; S Y Roth
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Repression domain of the yeast global repressor Tup1 interacts directly with histones H3 and H4.

Authors:  D G Edmondson; M M Smith; S Y Roth
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1996-05-15       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Repression by Ume6 involves recruitment of a complex containing Sin3 corepressor and Rpd3 histone deacetylase to target promoters.

Authors:  D Kadosh; K Struhl
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1997-05-02       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  A method for gene disruption that allows repeated use of URA3 selection in the construction of multiply disrupted yeast strains.

Authors:  E Alani; L Cao; N Kleckner
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  HDA1 and RPD3 are members of distinct yeast histone deacetylase complexes that regulate silencing and transcription.

Authors:  S E Rundlett; A A Carmen; R Kobayashi; S Bavykin; B M Turner; M Grunstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-12-10       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  A bacterial repressor protein or a yeast transcriptional terminator can block upstream activation of a yeast gene.

Authors:  R Brent; M Ptashne
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1984 Dec 13-19       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Extremely conserved histone H4 N terminus is dispensable for growth but essential for repressing the silent mating loci in yeast.

Authors:  P S Kayne; U J Kim; M Han; J R Mullen; F Yoshizaki; M Grunstein
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1988-10-07       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  Hrs1/Med3 is a Cyc8-Tup1 corepressor target in the RNA polymerase II holoenzyme.

Authors:  M Papamichos-Chronakis; R S Conlan; N Gounalaki; T Copf; D Tzamarias
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-03-24       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Yeast alpha 2 repressor positions nucleosomes in TRP1/ARS1 chromatin.

Authors:  S Y Roth; A Dean; R T Simpson
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  A complex composed of tup1 and ssn6 represses transcription in vitro.

Authors:  M J Redd; M B Arnaud; A D Johnson
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1997-04-25       Impact factor: 5.157

View more
  29 in total

1.  Srb7p is a physical and physiological target of Tup1p.

Authors:  A Gromöller; N Lehming
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Histone-dependent association of Tup1-Ssn6 with repressed genes in vivo.

Authors:  Judith K Davie; Robert J Trumbly; Sharon Y R Dent
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Shields up: the Tup1-Cyc8 repressor complex blocks coactivator recruitment.

Authors:  Emily J Parnell; David J Stillman
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  The Cyc8-Tup1 complex inhibits transcription primarily by masking the activation domain of the recruiting protein.

Authors:  Koon Ho Wong; Kevin Struhl
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 11.361

5.  Distinct role of Mediator tail module in regulation of SAGA-dependent, TATA-containing genes in yeast.

Authors:  Suraiya A Ansari; Mythily Ganapathi; Joris J Benschop; Frank C P Holstege; Joseph T Wade; Randall H Morse
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  A two-hybrid system for transactivator bait proteins.

Authors:  M Hirst; C Ho; L Sabourin; M Rudnicki; L Penn; I Sadowski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-07-10       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Synergy among differentially regulated repressors of the ribonucleotide diphosphate reductase genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Lee G Klinkenberg; Travis Webb; Richard S Zitomer
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2006-07

8.  Reciprocal nuclear shuttling of two antagonizing Zn finger proteins modulates Tup family corepressor function to repress chromatin remodeling.

Authors:  Kouji Hirota; Charles S Hoffman; Kunihiro Ohta
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2006-10-06

9.  Spreading of a corepressor linked to action of long-range repressor hairy.

Authors:  Carlos A Martinez; David N Arnosti
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Promoter-dependent roles for the Srb10 cyclin-dependent kinase and the Hda1 deacetylase in Tup1-mediated repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Sarah R Green; Alexander D Johnson
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2004-07-07       Impact factor: 4.138

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.