Literature DB >> 1092162

Digitalis toxicity: epidemiology and clinical use of serum concentration measurements.

T W Smith.   

Abstract

Despite continuing advances in understanding of the basic pharmacology of the cardiac glycosides, digitalis intoxication remains a common clinical problem. Physician education programs and increasing use of serum or plasma concentration data have, however, been shown to be capable of substantially reducing the incidence of digitalis toxicity. Methodologic progress and availability of commercial radioimmunoassay kits have placed measurement of clinically relevant serum or plasma cardiac glycoside concentrations within the capability of most well equipped clinical laboratories. Extensive experience with serum digitalis levels now provides a basis for ongoing examination of the role of these measurements in clinical practice. Results of studies to date demonstrate that mean serum digoxin and digitoxin levels are significantly higher in patients with electrocardiographic evidence of toxicity compared with patients without such evidence. It must be emphasized, however, that because of overlap in serum digitalis levels between these two groups, sole dependence on these levels for established of a diagnosis of digitalis toxicity is not warranted. Multiple factors influence individual responses to cardiac glycosides, and serum concentration data must be interpreted in the over-all clinical context. Type and extent of underlying heart disease are important determinants of the clinical response to any given dose or concentration of cardiac glycoside. Knowledge of the serum digitalis concentration is likely to be helpful in the setting of suspected digitalis intoxication in the absence of an adequate history, or in the presence of fluctuating renal function, overt or suspected malabsorption, or uncertain bioavailability. More generally, such measurements may prove useful whenever an unanticipated response to digitalis is encountered, whether it be suspected toxicity or the absence of an expected therapeutic effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1092162     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(75)90118-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  23 in total

1.  Serum digoxin test in perspective.

Authors:  A Dodek
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1977-11-05       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Digoxin therapy: textbooks, theory and practice.

Authors:  J K Aronson; D G Grahame-Smith
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 3.  Pulmonary disease and drug kinetics.

Authors:  P du Souich; A J McLean; D Lalka; S Erill; M Gibaldi
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1978 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 4.  Clinical relevance of pharmacokinetics.

Authors:  G Tognoni; C Bellantuono; M Bonati; M D'Incalci; M Gerna; R Latini; M Mandelli; M G Porro; E Riva
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1980 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Fasting and postprandial absorption of digoxin from a microencapsulated formulation.

Authors:  B Bergdahl; C Bogentoft; U E Jonsson; J O Magnusson
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 6.  The serum level approach to individualization of drug dosage.

Authors:  J Koch-Weser
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1975-10-10       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 7.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of digoxin.

Authors:  E Iisalo
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1977 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Mechanical and electrophysiological studies on the positive inotropic effect of 2-phenyl-4-oxo-hydroquinoline in rat cardiac tissues.

Authors:  M J Su; G J Chang; S C Kuo
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 8.739

9.  Hemodynamic monitoring and care of the patient of high risk for anesthesia.

Authors:  S P Pietak; S J Teasdale
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1979-10-06       Impact factor: 8.262

10.  One hundred digitalis blood levels. A utilization review.

Authors:  W B Hladik; C A Dujovne
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 2.953

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.