Literature DB >> 10921219

Interobserver agreement of the Nottingham histologic grading scheme for infiltrating duct carcinoma breast.

M Sikka1, S Agarwal, A Bhatia.   

Abstract

Interobserver agreement of the histologic grading scheme for infiltrating duct carcinoma (IDC) of breast was assessed. Three pathologists independently evaluated histologic grade using the modified Bloom and Richardson histological grading system on 40 cases of IDC breast. Pairwise K value for agreement ranged from 0.68-0.83 (median 0.68) for histological grade suggesting substantial agreement. Generalized K values were 0.54, 0.34 and 0.36 for tubule formation, nuclear pleomorphism and mitotic count respectively indicating moderate and fair agreement. Similar levels of agreement were obtained specially in the final histologic grade between pathologists routinely reporting histopathology material and one pathologist who was not. This was achieved by use of precise guidelines. The ease with which this grading system could be applied by pathologists on histopathology material will greatly help its acceptability in routine histopathology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10921219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Cancer        ISSN: 0019-509X            Impact factor:   1.224


  6 in total

Review 1.  An overview of assessment of prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer needle core biopsy specimens.

Authors:  E A Rakha; I O Ellis
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2007-07-14       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Grading invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: advantages of using automated proliferation index instead of mitotic count.

Authors:  Ossama Tawfik; Bruce F Kimler; Marilyn Davis; Christopher Stasik; Sue-Min Lai; Matthew S Mayo; Fang Fan; John K Donahue; Ivan Damjanov; Patricia Thomas; Carol Connor; William R Jewell; Holly Smith; Carol J Fabian
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2007-04-26       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Tumor architecture exerts no bias on nuclear grading in breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Braulio Mora; Dario Bombari; Stephan C Schaefer; Marcus Schmidt; Jean-Francois Delaloye; Fred Mast; Hans-Anton Lehr
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 4.  Breast cancer prognostic classification in the molecular era: the role of histological grade.

Authors:  Emad A Rakha; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Frederick Baehner; David J Dabbs; Thomas Decker; Vincenzo Eusebi; Stephen B Fox; Shu Ichihara; Jocelyne Jacquemier; Sunil R Lakhani; José Palacios; Andrea L Richardson; Stuart J Schnitt; Fernando C Schmitt; Puay-Hoon Tan; Gary M Tse; Sunil Badve; Ian O Ellis
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 6.466

5.  Breast Cancer Prognostic Factors in the Digital Era: Comparison of Nottingham Grade using Whole Slide Images and Glass Slides.

Authors:  Tara M Davidson; Mara H Rendi; Paul D Frederick; Tracy Onega; Kimberly H Allison; Ezgi Mercan; Tad T Brunyé; Linda G Shapiro; Donald L Weaver; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2019-04-03

Review 6.  Grading of invasive breast carcinoma: the way forward.

Authors:  C van Dooijeweert; P J van Diest; I O Ellis
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.535

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.