Literature DB >> 10919804

Affinity purification of DNA and RNA from environmental samples with peptide nucleic acid clamps.

D P Chandler1, J R Stults, S Cebula, B L Schuck, D W Weaver, K K Anderson, M Egholm, F J Brockman.   

Abstract

Bispeptide nucleic acids (bis-PNAs; PNA clamps), PNA oligomers, and DNA oligonucleotides were evaluated as affinity purification reagents for subfemtomolar 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) and rRNA targets in soil, sediment, and industrial air filter nucleic acid extracts. Under low-salt hybridization conditions (10 mM NaPO(4), 5 mM disodium EDTA, and 0.025% sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS]) a PNA clamp recovered significantly more target DNA than either PNA or DNA oligomers. The efficacy of PNA clamps and oligomers was generally enhanced in the presence of excess nontarget DNA and in a low-salt extraction-hybridization buffer. Under high-salt conditions (200 mM NaPO(4), 100 mM disodium EDTA, and 0.5% SDS), however, capture efficiencies with the DNA oligomer were significantly greater than with the PNA clamp and PNA oligomer. Recovery and detection efficiencies for target DNA concentrations of > or =100 pg were generally >20% but depended upon the specific probe, solution background, and salt condition. The DNA probe had a lower absolute detection limit of 100 fg of target (830 zM [1 zM = 10(-21) M]) in high-salt buffer. In the absence of exogenous DNA (e.g., soil background), neither the bis-PNA nor the PNA oligomer achieved the same absolute detection limit even under a more favorable low-salt hybridization condition. In the presence of a soil background, however, both PNA probes provided more sensitive absolute purification and detection (830 zM) than the DNA oligomer. In varied environmental samples, the rank order for capture probe performance in high-salt buffer was DNA > PNA > clamp. Recovery of 16S rRNA from environmental samples mirrored quantitative results for DNA target recovery, with the DNA oligomer generating more positive results than either the bis-PNA or PNA oligomer, but PNA probes provided a greater incidence of detection from environmental samples that also contained a higher concentration of nontarget DNA and RNA. Significant interactions between probe type and environmental sample indicate that the most efficacious capture system depends upon the particular sample type (and background nucleic acid concentration), target (DNA or RNA), and detection objective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10919804      PMCID: PMC92168          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.66.8.3438-3445.2000

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  46 in total

1.  Peptide nucleic acid-mediated PCR clamping as a useful supplement in the determination of microbial diversity.

Authors:  F von Wintzingerode; O Landt; A Ehrlich; U B Göbel
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Physiological diversity and distributions of heterotrophic bacteria in deep cretaceous sediments of the atlantic coastal plain.

Authors:  J K Fredrickson; D L Balkwill; J M Zachara; S M Li; F J Brockman; M A Simmons
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Solid-phase polymerase chain reaction: applications for direct detection of enteric pathogens in waters.

Authors:  G A Toranzos; A J Alvarez
Journal:  Can J Microbiol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Phylogenetic Diversity of Archaea and Bacteria in a Deep Subsurface Paleosol

Authors: 
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.552

5.  Manganese peroxidase mRNA and enzyme activity levels during bioremediation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-contaminated soil with Phanerochaete chrysosporium.

Authors:  B W Bogan; B Schoenike; R T Lamar; D Cullen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Single base pair mutation analysis by PNA directed PCR clamping.

Authors:  H Orum; P E Nielsen; M Egholm; R H Berg; O Buchardt; C Stanley
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1993-11-25       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Sequence specific inhibition of DNA restriction enzyme cleavage by PNA.

Authors:  P E Nielsen; M Egholm; R H Berg; O Buchardt
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1993-01-25       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Characterization of attached bacterial populations in deep granitic groundwater from the Stripa research mine by 16S rRNA gene sequencing and scanning electron microscopy.

Authors:  S Ekendahl; J Arlinger; F Ståhl; K Pedersen
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.777

9.  Comparative analysis of nitrifying bacteria associated with freshwater and marine aquaria.

Authors:  T A Hovanec; E F DeLong
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Detection and enumeration of bacteria in soil by direct DNA extraction and polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  C Picard; C Ponsonnet; E Paget; X Nesme; P Simonet
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  8 in total

1.  Automated purification and suspension array detection of 16S rRNA from soil and sediment extracts by using tunable surface microparticles.

Authors:  Darrell P Chandler; Ann E Jarrell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 2.  PNA Technology.

Authors:  Peter E Nielsen
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.695

Review 3.  Current and developing technologies for monitoring agents of bioterrorism and biowarfare.

Authors:  Daniel V Lim; Joyce M Simpson; Elizabeth A Kearns; Marianne F Kramer
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Direct detection of 16S rRNA in soil extracts by using oligonucleotide microarrays.

Authors:  J Small; D R Call; F J Brockman; T M Straub; D P Chandler
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Development of a single-step subtraction method for eukaryotic 18S and 28S ribonucleic acids.

Authors:  Marie J Archer; Baochuan Lin
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2011-06-25

6.  Sensitive and label-free biosensing of RNA with predicted secondary structures by a triplex affinity capture method.

Authors:  Laura G Carrascosa; S Gómez-Montes; A Aviñó; A Nadal; M Pla; R Eritja; L M Lechuga
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 7.  Molecular beacons of xeno-nucleic acid for detecting nucleic acid.

Authors:  Qi Wang; Lei Chen; Yitao Long; He Tian; Junchen Wu
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2013-05-05       Impact factor: 11.556

8.  Characterizing Microbiomes via Sequencing of Marker Loci: Techniques To Improve Throughput, Account for Cross-Contamination, and Reduce Cost.

Authors:  Joshua G Harrison; Gregory D Randolph; C Alex Buerkle
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 6.496

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.