Literature DB >> 10918327

Recording of the event-related potentials during functional MRI at 3.0 Tesla field strength.

F Kruggel1, C J Wiggins, C S Herrmann, D Y von Cramon.   

Abstract

The feasibility of recording event-related potentials (ERP) during functional MRI (fMRI) scanning was studied. Using an alternating checkerboard stimulus in a blocked presentation, visually evoked potentials were obtained with their expected configuration and latencies. A clustered echoplanar imaging protocol was applied to observe the hemodynamic response due to the visual stimulus interleaved with measuring ERPs. Influences of the electrode/amplifier set up on MRI scanning and the scanning process on the recording of electrophysiological signals are reported and discussed. Artifacts overlaid on the electrophysiological recordings were corrected by post hoc filtering methods presented here. Implications and limitations of conducting combined ERP/fMRI experiments using higher-level cognitive stimuli are discussed. Magn Reson Med 44:277-282, 2000. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10918327     DOI: 10.1002/1522-2594(200008)44:2<277::aid-mrm15>3.0.co;2-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  10 in total

1.  Simultaneous event-related potential and near-infrared spectroscopic studies of semantic processing.

Authors:  Silvina G Horovitz; John C Gore
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Sparse imaging and continuous event-related fMRI in the visual domain: a systematic comparison.

Authors:  Katharina Nebel; Philipp Stude; Holger Wiese; Bernhard Müller; Armin de Greiff; Michael Forsting; Hans-Christoph Diener; Matthias Keidel
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Visual evoked potentials may be recorded simultaneously with fMRI scanning: A validation study.

Authors:  Eleonora Comi; Pietro Annovazzi; Ana Martins Silva; Marco Cursi; Valeria Blasi; Marcello Cadioli; Alberto Inuggi; Andrea Falini; Giancarlo Comi; Letizia Leocani
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Visual evoked potentials recovered from fMRI scan periods.

Authors:  Robert Becker; Petra Ritter; Matthias Moosmann; Arno Villringer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Evaluating the spatial relationship of event-related potential and functional MRI sources in the primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Kevin Whittingstall; Gerhard Stroink; Matthias Schmidt
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Validity and power in hemodynamic response modeling: a comparison study and a new approach.

Authors:  Martin A Lindquist; Tor D Wager
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Simultaneously recorded EEG-fMRI: removal of gradient artifacts by subtraction of head movement related average artifact waveforms.

Authors:  Limin Sun; Hermann Hinrichs
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  An EEG (electroencephalogram) recording system with carbon wire electrodes for simultaneous EEG-fMRI (functional magnetic resonance imaging) recording.

Authors:  Michiro Negishi; Mark Abildgaard; Ilan Laufer; Terry Nixon; Robert Todd Constable
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2008-06-07       Impact factor: 2.390

9.  Modeling the hemodynamic response function in fMRI: efficiency, bias and mis-modeling.

Authors:  Martin A Lindquist; Ji Meng Loh; Lauren Y Atlas; Tor D Wager
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  The BOLD response and the gamma oscillations respond differently than evoked potentials: an interleaved EEG-fMRI study.

Authors:  Jack R Foucher; Hélène Otzenberger; Daniel Gounot
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2003-09-19       Impact factor: 3.288

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.