Literature DB >> 10918135

Leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) concentration modulates embryonic stem cell self-renewal and differentiation independently of proliferation.

P W Zandstra1, H V Le, G Q Daley, L G Griffith, D A Lauffenburger.   

Abstract

A major limitation of the widespread use of stem cells in a variety of biotechnological applications is the relatively low level of knowledge about how to maintain these cells in vitro without losing the long-term multilineage growth properties required for their clinical utility. An experimental and theoretical framework for predicting and controlling the outcome of stem cell stimulation by exogenous cytokines would thus be useful. An emerging theme from recent hematopoietic stem cell (HSC)-expansion studies is that a net gain in HSC numbers requires the maintenance of critical signaling ligand(s) above a threshold level. These ligand-receptor complex thresholds can be maintained, for example, by high concentrations of soluble cytokines or by cytokine presentation on cell surfaces. According to such a model, when the relevant ligand-receptor interaction falls below this threshold level, the probability of a differentiation response is increased; otherwise, self-renewal is favored. Taking advantage of the ability of the cytokine leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) to maintain embryonic stem (ES) cell pluripotentiality at high concentrations, we are testing this model by investigating critical parameters in the control of ES cell responses. We have developed quantitative assays of ES cell differentiation by measuring cell-surface alkaline phosphatase activity, cell-surface stage specific embryonic antigen (SSEA)-1 expression, and the ability of ES cells to form embryoid bodies. Examination of ES cell responses over a range of LIF concentrations shows that LIF supplementation has little effect on ES cell-growth rate but significantly alters the probability of a cell undergoing a self-renewal vs. a differentiation division. In vitro culture parameters such as inoculum cell density, medium exchange, as well as cell-intrinsic processes such as autocrine secretion are shown to affect this decision. In addition to yielding new information on stem cell regulation by exogenous factors, these studies provide important clues about culture of these cells and should stimulate further investigations into the mechanistic basis of stem cell differentiation control. Copyright 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Biotechnol Bioeng 69: 607-617, 2000.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10918135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng        ISSN: 0006-3592            Impact factor:   4.530


  26 in total

1.  In vitro propagation and transcriptional profiling of human mammary stem/progenitor cells.

Authors:  Gabriela Dontu; Wissam M Abdallah; Jessica M Foley; Kyle W Jackson; Michael F Clarke; Mari J Kawamura; Max S Wicha
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2003-05-15       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  Optimization of a serum-free culture medium for mouse embryonic stem cells using design of experiments (DoE) methodology.

Authors:  Fanny Knöspel; Rudolf K Schindler; Marc Lübberstedt; Stephanie Petzolt; Jörg C Gerlach; Katrin Zeilinger
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 2.058

3.  Cell patterning chip for controlling the stem cell microenvironment.

Authors:  Adam Rosenthal; Alice Macdonald; Joel Voldman
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2007-03-27       Impact factor: 12.479

4.  Towards predictive models of stem cell fate.

Authors:  Sowmya Viswanathan; Peter W Zandstra
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.058

5.  A microfluidic trap array for longitudinal monitoring and multi-modal phenotypic analysis of individual stem cell aggregates.

Authors:  E L Jackson-Holmes; T C McDevitt; H Lu
Journal:  Lab Chip       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 6.799

6.  Comparison of gene-specific DNA methylation patterns in equine induced pluripotent stem cell lines with cells derived from equine adult and fetal tissues.

Authors:  Catherine H Hackett; Line Greve; Kira D Novakofski; Lisa A Fortier
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 3.272

7.  Attenuation of extrinsic signaling reveals the importance of matrix remodeling on maintenance of embryonic stem cell self-renewal.

Authors:  Laralynne M Przybyla; Joel Voldman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-03       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Wnt/beta-catenin/CBP signaling maintains long-term murine embryonic stem cell pluripotency.

Authors:  Tomoyuki Miyabayashi; Jia-Ling Teo; Masashi Yamamoto; Michael McMillan; Cu Nguyen; Michael Kahn
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-03-19       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Analysis of Rex1 (zfp42) function in embryonic stem cell differentiation.

Authors:  Kymora B Scotland; Siming Chen; Renia Sylvester; Lorraine J Gudas
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.780

10.  Cell lineages and the logic of proliferative control.

Authors:  Arthur D Lander; Kimberly K Gokoffski; Frederic Y M Wan; Qing Nie; Anne L Calof
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.