Literature DB >> 10917411

Efficacy of venlafaxine and predictors of response in a prospective open-label study of patients with treatment-resistant major depression.

P B Mitchell1, I Schweitzer, G Burrows, G Johnson, A Polonowita.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to replicate the findings of a 1994 study, in which a 30% response rate to venlafaxine was found in patients with treatment-refractory depression, as well as to examine for any predictors of such an outcome. The study was an 8-week, open-label, prospective investigation of venlafaxine in doses up to 300 mg in 312 patients fulfilling criteria for either "absolute" or "relative" treatment resistance. By week 8, 52.6% of the patients had responded, which was defined as a 50% reduction in scores on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale; 49% of those defined with "absolute resistance" demonstrated such an outcome. Forty-five percent of the patients with absolute resistance who had failed to respond to at least one tricyclic antidepressant responded to venlafaxine. Response rates were higher in those with an absence (57.5%) compared with the presence (31.0%) of any comorbid psychiatric disorder (p < 0.001), "marked" (60.3%) compared with "mild or moderate" (51.6%) or "severe" (43.4%) baseline ratings on the patient-rated Clinical Global Impressions Scale (p < 0.05), and "relative" (61%) compared with "absolute" resistance (49%) (p = 0.06). Furthermore, improvement in scores of 20% or 30% at weeks 1 or 2 was associated with higher rates of final response (p < 0.0005). After logistic regression, both comorbid psychiatric illness (p < 0.001) and early improvement (p < 0.0001) remained significant and independent predictors of final response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10917411     DOI: 10.1097/00004714-200008000-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Psychopharmacol        ISSN: 0271-0749            Impact factor:   3.153


  6 in total

1.  Mirtazapine for treatment-resistant depression: a preliminary report.

Authors:  Dante D C Wan; Divya Kundhur; Kevin Solomons; Lakshmi N Yatham; Raymond W Lam
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 6.186

2.  Open-label treatment with desvenlafaxine in postmenopausal women with major depressive disorder not responding to acute treatment with desvenlafaxine or escitalopram.

Authors:  Claudio N Soares; Michael E Thase; Anita Clayton; Christine J Guico-Pabia; Kristen Focht; Qin Jiang; Susan G Kornstein; Phillip T Ninan; Cecelia P Kane
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 3.  Psychosocial and clinical predictors of response to pharmacotherapy for depression.

Authors:  R Michael Bagby; Andrew G Ryder; Carolina Cristi
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 6.186

Review 4.  Therapeutic options for treatment-resistant depression.

Authors:  Richard C Shelton; Olawale Osuntokun; Alexandra N Heinloth; Sara A Corya
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.749

5.  A systematic literature review of the clinical efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in non-treatment resistant patients with major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Jeffrey Voigt; Linda Carpenter; Andrew Leuchter
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 3.630

6.  Standardisation framework for the Maudsley staging method for treatment resistance in depression.

Authors:  Abebaw Fekadu; Jacek G Donocik; Anthony J Cleare
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 3.630

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.