Literature DB >> 10914081

Arm placement of the Cook titanium Petite Vital-Port: results of radiologic placement in 125 patients with cancer.

B Burbridge1, E Krieger, G Stoneham.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Patients with cancer require reliable venous access for therapy and phlebotomy. Traditionally, insertion of venous ports has been performed in the operating room. However, the interventional radiology service has recently become involved in the placement of a variety of venous access devices. This study examines the technique and complications associated with the placement of venous ports in the arm for patients with cancer.
METHODS: Cook titanium Petite Vital-Ports (Cook Canada, Stouffville, Ont.) were implanted in patients with cancer, and implantation was performed in the medical imaging vascular/interventional suite. Patients were followed prospectively by periodic chart review for a maximum of 42 months after port insertion. Minimum follow-up in patients who did not die from cancer was 6 months.
RESULTS: The authors implanted 125 Vital-Ports. The mean duration of port implantation was 265 days (range 2 to 1278 days, total catheter days 33 221). Venous thrombosis developed in 5 patients (4%, or 0.06 episodes/1000 catheter days). Four patients (3.2%, or 0.12 episodes/1000 catheter days) had suspected infection of the port or catheter, and 2 had culture-positive infection (1.6%, or 0.06 episodes/1000 catheter days). Two patients (1.6%, or 0.06 episodes/1000 catheter days) required port or catheter revision owing to mechanical difficulties.
CONCLUSION: The Cook titanium Petite Vital-Port, implanted in the arm in the medical imaging vascular/interventional suite, is relatively safe and effective. As a result, it has been widely accepted by the patients and clinicians at the hospital where this study was conducted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10914081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Assoc Radiol J        ISSN: 0846-5371            Impact factor:   2.248


  8 in total

1.  Current situation regarding central venous port implantation procedures and complications: a questionnaire-based survey of 11,693 implantations in Japan.

Authors:  Masatoshi Shiono; Shin Takahashi; Masanobu Takahashi; Takuhiro Yamaguchi; Chikashi Ishioka
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 2.  Systematic review: malfunction of totally implantable venous access devices in cancer patients.

Authors:  Godelieve Alice Goossens; Marguerite Stas; Martine Jérôme; Philip Moons
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Protocol for the implantation of a venous access device (Port-A-Cath System). The complications and solutions found in 560 cases.

Authors:  Luis Yeste Sánchez; José M Galbis Caravajal; Carlos A Fuster Diana; Enrique Moledo Eiras
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  Long-term outcomes of peripheral arm ports implanted in patients with colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Junichiro Kawamura; Satoshi Nagayama; Akinari Nomura; Atsushi Itami; Hiroshi Okabe; Seiji Sato; Go Watanabe; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Comparison of the Quality of Life of Patients with Breast or Colon Cancer with an Arm Vein Port (TIVAD) Versus a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC).

Authors:  Brent Burbridge; Hyun Lim; Lynn Dwernychuk; Ha Le; Tehmina Asif; Amer Sami; Shahid Ahmed
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 3.677

6.  Catheter fracture and embolization related to an arm venous port.

Authors:  Brent E Burbridge
Journal:  Case Rep Radiol       Date:  2011-10-05

7.  Upper arm central venous port implantation: a 6-year single institutional retrospective analysis and pictorial essay of procedures for insertion.

Authors:  Masatoshi Shiono; Shin Takahashi; Yuichi Kakudo; Masanobu Takahashi; Hideki Shimodaira; Shunsuke Kato; Chikashi Ishioka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A retrospective analysis on the utility and complications of upper arm ports in 433 cases at a single institute.

Authors:  Yukiko Mori; Satoshi Nagayama; Jun-Ichiro Kawamura; Suguru Hasegawa; Eiji Tanaka; Hiroshi Okabe; Megumi Takeuchi; Makoto Sonobe; Shigemi Matsumoto; Masashi Kanai; Manabu Muto; Tsutomu Chiba; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 3.402

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.