Literature DB >> 10912550

Evaluation of a community-based intervention to increase breastfeeding prevalence.

R J McInnes1, J G Love, D H Stone.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to determine whether peer counselling in the antenatal and post-natal period would increase the prevalence and duration of breastfeeding among low-income women in Glasgow.
METHODS: The study was designed as a quasi-experimental evaluation of a community-based breastfeeding promotion programme. The intervention comprised peer counselling of pregnant women, support of breastfeeding mothers and local awareness-raising activities. The study subjects were all women attending the antenatal booking clinic resident in either the intervention or control area. Data were collected by means of four self-completion questionnaires, two administered antenatally and two post-natally. The proportions intending to breastfeed or breastfeeding in the intervention and control groups were compared at each assessment and over time.
RESULTS: Of the 995 women enrolled in the study, data were available for analysis on 919 (92 per cent) to 6 weeks postnatally. At booking, 18 per cent of the intervention group and 21 per cent of the control group stated an intention to breastfeed. At delivery, the proportions initiating breastfeeding were 23 per cent of the intervention subjects and 20 per cent of the controls, and by 6 weeks post-natally, the proportion providing any breast milk had declined to 10 per cent of the intervention group and 8 per cent of the control group. Using multivariate analysis to adjust for factors (such as socio-economic status) known to influence breastfeeding, the breastfeeding prevalence was significantly higher in the intervention group relative to the controls at delivery [odds ratio (OR) 2.0; 95 per cent confidence interval (CI) 1.2-3.1, p = 0.006]. By 6 weeks post-natally the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (OR 1.8; 95 per cent CI 1.0-3.4, p=0.07).
CONCLUSIONS: As the impact of the intervention was not sustained even for the modest duration of 6 weeks postnatally, it would be premature to justify widespread use of peer support programmes to increase the prevalence of breastfeeding in socially disadvantaged communities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10912550     DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/22.2.138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Public Health Med        ISSN: 0957-4832


  34 in total

Review 1.  Promoting the initiation of breast feeding.

Authors:  L Fairbank; S O'Meara; A J Sowden; M J Renfrew; M M Woolridge
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-06

2.  Interventions to promote breast-feeding: applying the evidence in clinical practice.

Authors:  Valerie A Palda; Jeanne-Marie Guise; C Nadine Wathen
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-03-16       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Lay health workers in primary and community health care for maternal and child health and the management of infectious diseases.

Authors:  Simon Lewin; Susan Munabi-Babigumira; Claire Glenton; Karen Daniels; Xavier Bosch-Capblanch; Brian E van Wyk; Jan Odgaard-Jensen; Marit Johansen; Godwin N Aja; Merrick Zwarenstein; Inger B Scheel
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-03-17

4.  The impact of breastfeeding peer support for mothers aged under 25: a time series analysis.

Authors:  Sarah Scott; Catherine Pritchard; Lisa Szatkowski
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 5.  Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies.

Authors:  Mary J Renfrew; Felicia M McCormick; Angela Wade; Beverley Quinn; Therese Dowswell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-05-16

6.  Lay support for breastfeeding.

Authors:  Pat Hoddinott; Jane Britten
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Breastfeeding peer supporters and a community support group: evaluating their effectiveness.

Authors:  Jenny Ingram; Jilly Rosser; Dawn Jackson
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.092

8.  The effect of a programme of organised and supervised peer support on the initiation and duration of breastfeeding: a randomised trial.

Authors:  Patricia E Muirhead; Geraldine Butcher; Jean Rankin; Andrew Munley
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Feasibility and acceptability of a motivational interviewing breastfeeding peer support intervention.

Authors:  Lauren Copeland; Laura Merrett; Cheryl McQuire; Aimee Grant; Nina Gobat; Sally Tedstone; Rebecca Playle; Sue Channon; Julia Sanders; Rhiannon Phillips; Billie Hunter; Amy Brown; Deborah Fitzsimmons; Michael Robling; Shantini Paranjothy
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 3.092

10.  The effect of maternal breast variations on neonatal weight gain in the first seven days of life.

Authors:  Reza Vazirinejad; Shokoofeh Darakhshan; Abbas Esmaeili; Shiva Hadadian
Journal:  Int Breastfeed J       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 3.461

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.