Literature DB >> 10907670

The effect of d-amphetamine on performance on two operant timing schedules.

T J Chiang1, A S Al-Ruwaitea, S Mobini, M Y Ho, C M Bradshaw, E Szabadi.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: Previous experiments have shown that d-amphetamine disrupts timing behaviour in rats. It has been proposed that d-amphetamine's effects reflect a reduction in the period of the pacemaker of the hypothetical internal clock. However, some studies have obtained conflicting results.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the effects of d-amphetamine (0.2, 0.4, 0.8 mg kg(-1) i.p.) on performance on two quantitative timing schedules: a free-operant schedule, in which rats were trained to distribute their responses differentially between two levers during the course of a 50-s trial (free-operant psychophysical procedure), and a discrete-trials schedule, in which rats were trained to discriminate the duration of light stimuli (interval bisection task).
METHODS: In experiment 1, rats were trained under the free-operant psychophysical procedure to respond on two levers (A and B) in 50-s trials in which reinforcement was provided intermittently for responding on A during the first half and on B during the second half of the trial. For one group, repetitive switching between levers was permitted; for another group, it was prevented. In experiment 2, rats were exposed to press lever A after a 2-s stimulus and lever B after an 8-s stimulus, and were then tested with stimuli of intermediate duration. For one group, a 'poke response' (depression of a central tray flap) was required after stimulus presentation to effect lever presentation; for the other group, this requirement did not operate. In both experiments, quantitative indices of timing were derived from the psychophysical functions (%B responding vs time).
RESULTS: In experiment 1, d-amphetamine increased the Weber fraction and displaced the psychophysical curve to the left in both versions of the schedule, as well as producing rate-dependent suppression of responding. In experiment 2, d-amphetamine increased the Weber fraction in both versions of the task without displacing the curve.
CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm the disruptive effect of d-amphetamine on timing. The results of experiment 1 are consistent with the proposal that the drug reduces the period of the hypothetical pacemaker. However, the results of experiment 2 do not support this suggestion. Taken together, the results support the notion that different neural mechanisms may be involved in timing tasks involving temporal distribution of responding and discrimination of the duration of exteroceptive stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10907670     DOI: 10.1007/s002130000422

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  29 in total

1.  Evidence for the sensitivity of operant timing behaviour to stimulation of D1 dopamine receptors.

Authors:  T H C Cheung; G Bezzina; C L Hampson; S Body; K C F Fone; C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Rapid acquisition of preference in concurrent chains: effects of d-amphetamine on sensitivity to reinforcement delay.

Authors:  Wei-Min Ta; Raymond C Pitts; Christine E Hughes; Anthony P McLean; Randolph C Grace
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The effect of the adenosine A(2A) antagonist KW-6002 on motor and motivational processes in the rat.

Authors:  Martin O'Neill; Verity J Brown
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-12-13       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Disruptive effects of stimulus intensity on two variations of a temporal discrimination procedure.

Authors:  Erin A McClure; Kathryn A Saulsgiver; Clive D L Wynne
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Revisiting the effect of nicotine on interval timing.

Authors:  Carter W Daniels; Elizabeth Watterson; Raul Garcia; Gabriel J Mazur; Ryan J Brackney; Federico Sanabria
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Single-trials analyses demonstrate that increases in clock speed contribute to the methamphetamine-induced horizontal shifts in peak-interval timing functions.

Authors:  Matthew S Matell; Melissa Bateson; Warren H Meck
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-08-26       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Nicotine does not enhance discrimination performance in a temporal bisection procedure.

Authors:  Ryan D Ward; Scott T Barrett; Robert N Johnson; Amy L Odum
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.293

8.  Evidence for a role of D1 dopamine receptors in d-amphetamine's effect on timing behaviour in the free-operant psychophysical procedure.

Authors:  T H C Cheung; G Bezzina; K Asgari; S Body; K C F Fone; C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 4.530

9.  Effects of fenfluramine on free-operant timing behaviour: evidence for involvement of 5-HT2A receptors.

Authors:  S Body; S Kheramin; M-Y Ho; F Miranda Herrera; C M Bradshaw; E Szabadi
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2004-04-22       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Mechanisms of impulsive choice: I. Individual differences in interval timing and reward processing.

Authors:  Andrew T Marshall; Aaron P Smith; Kimberly Kirkpatrick
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.