Literature DB >> 10906406

Behavioural evaluation of methods for assessing fear responses in weaned pigs.

.   

Abstract

Models of anxiety and fear of novelty were evaluated using correlations and principal component analysis. A total of 84 pigs (LandracexYorkshire) from nine different litters were subjected to a tonic immobility (TI) test at the age of 2.5 weeks, an elevated plus-maze (EPM) at the age of 6 weeks, a light/dark (L/D) exploration test at the age of 7 weeks and an open-field (OF) test at the age of 8 weeks.The first component from the principal component analysis had the highest correlation with number of entries into open arms in the EPM but was also highly correlated to variables from the other three tests confirming a common aversion-related element in the four experimental tests. The second component was negatively correlated with percent entries into and time spent on open arms in the EPM, but positively correlated with the number of entries into closed arms in the same test, number of lines crossed in the OF and time spent in the lit compartment of the L/D test. The last point illustrates a negative relationship between "anxiety" and "activity" in the EPM and OF. To achieve purer measures of fear of novelty and activity in the tests, the components were rotated using the Varimax criterion. The rotated factor pattern demonstrated a simple structure where variables related to "anxiety" or "fear of novelty" (i.e., percent entries into open arms and time spent on open arms of the EPM) had the highest loading on factor 1, whereas variables related to activity (i.e., number of entries into the closed arms in the EPM, number of lines crossed in the OF and time spent in the lit compartment of the L/D test) had the highest loading on factor 2. TI duration loaded more strongly on factor 1 ("fear of novelty") than on factor 2 ("activity"), but did not represent any pure measure of either fear of novelty or activity.In conclusion, all of the test variables were related to one another. Open-arm avoidance represented the purest measure of fear of novelty, whereas entries into closed arms and number of lines crossed in the OF were the purest measures of activity. The EPM appeared to provide the best way to separate the fear of novelty and activity-related elements, indicating that the EPM may be a useful behavioural model of fear of novelty or avoidance in pigs.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 10906406     DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1591(00)00133-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Anim Behav Sci        ISSN: 0168-1591            Impact factor:   2.448


  6 in total

1.  Constructing an Inexpensive Elevated Plus Maze.

Authors:  Grant A Fox; Eugene Torigoe; Greg Q Butcher
Journal:  J Undergrad Neurosci Educ       Date:  2018-06-15

2.  NLRP3-dependent pyroptosis is required for HIV-1 gp120-induced neuropathology.

Authors:  Xiaolong He; Weijun Yang; Zhijie Zeng; Yi Wei; Jie Gao; Bao Zhang; Li Li; Liqun Liu; Yu Wan; Qing Zeng; Zelong Gong; Liting Liu; Hanyun Zhang; Yubin Li; Shaojie Yang; Tongtong Hu; Lixian Wu; Eliezer Masliah; Shenghe Huang; Hong Cao
Journal:  Cell Mol Immunol       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 11.530

3.  Anxiolytic and Antiepileptic Properties of the Aqueous Extract of Cissus quadrangularis (Vitaceae) in Mice Pilocarpine Model of Epilepsy.

Authors:  Fleur C O Moto; Aren Arsa'a; Gwladys T Ngoupaye; Germain S Taiwe; Jacqueline S K Njapdounke; Antoine K Kandeda; Gisele C N Nkantchoua; Jean P Omam Omam; Simon Pale; Nadege E Kouemou; Espoir R Ayissi Mbomo; David B Pahaye; Lucie Ojong; Veronique Mairara; Elisabeth Ngo Bum
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 5.810

4.  Qualitative Behavioural Assessment of emotionality in pigs.

Authors:  Kenneth M D Rutherford; Ramona D Donald; Alistair B Lawrence; Françoise Wemelsfelder
Journal:  Appl Anim Behav Sci       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.448

5.  Behavioural repertoire of working donkeys and consistency of behaviour over time, as a preliminary step towards identifying pain-related behaviours.

Authors:  Fran H Regan; Jo Hockenhull; Joy C Pritchard; Avril E Waterman-Pearson; Helen R Whay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-07-30       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Stress-induced changes in group behaviour.

Authors:  Tanja K Kleinhappel; Thomas W Pike; Oliver H P Burman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.