Literature DB >> 10905819

Misdiagnoses of tuberculosis resulting from laboratory cross-contamination of Mycobacterium tuberculosis cultures--New Jersey, 1998.

.   

Abstract

A diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) is rarely disputed if Mycobacterium tuberculosis is isolated from a clinical specimen; however, specimen contamination may occur (1-3). Identification of TB strain patterns through molecular typing or DNA fingerprinting is a recent advancement in TB laboratory techniques (3-7). CDC's National Tuberculosis Genotyping and Surveillance Network (NTGSN) performs DNA fingerprinting on TB isolates to determine the frequency of clustering among M. tuberculosis strains in project surveillance sites. In November 1998, NTGSN detected 11 isolates from previously reported TB cases among persons in New Jersey whose DNA fingerprints matched the avirulent laboratory M. tuberculosis control strain H37Ra. H37Ra does not cause active TB in humans, but it has been reported as a source of cross-contamination (8). In collaboration with the New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services, CDC investigated H37Ra as a possible cause of TB disease and/or TB misdiagnoses caused by laboratory cross-contamination in the 11 case-patients. This report describes findings from two of the 11 cases and summarizes the results of this investigation, which indicate that TB was misdiagnosed and demonstrate the value of DNA fingerprinting to identify occurrences of cross-contamination of patient specimens.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10905819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep        ISSN: 0149-2195            Impact factor:   17.586


  6 in total

1.  Impact of laboratory cross-contamination on molecular epidemiology studies of tuberculosis.

Authors:  Miguel Martínez; Darío García de Viedma; María Alonso; Sandra Andrés; Emilio Bouza; Teresa Cabezas; Isabel Cabeza; Armando Reyes; Waldo Sánchez-Yebra; Manuel Rodríguez; M Isabel Sánchez; M Cruz Rogado; Rosa Fernández; Teresa Peñafiel; Juan Martínez; Pilar Barroso; M Angeles Lucerna; L Felipe Diez; Carmelo Gutiérrez
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  False-positive mycobacterium tuberculosis cultures in 44 laboratories in The Netherlands (1993 to 2000): incidence, risk factors, and consequences.

Authors:  Annette S de Boer; Barbara Blommerde; Petra E W de Haas; Maruschka M G G Sebek; Kitty S B Lambregts-van Weezenbeek; Mirjam Dessens; Dick van Soolingen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Molecular epidemiology of tuberculosis: current insights.

Authors:  Barun Mathema; Natalia E Kurepina; Pablo J Bifani; Barry N Kreiswirth
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 26.132

4.  Infrequent MODS TB culture cross-contamination in a high-burden resource-poor setting.

Authors:  David A J Moore; Luz Caviedes; Robert H Gilman; Jorge Coronel; Fanny Arenas; Doris LaChira; Cayo Salazar; Juan Carlos Saravia; Richard A Oberhelman; Maria-Graciela Hollm-Delgado; A Roderick Escombe; Carlton A W Evans; Jon S Friedland
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2006-05-06       Impact factor: 2.803

5.  A prospective, multicenter study of laboratory cross-contamination of Mycobacterium tuberculosis cultures.

Authors:  Robert M Jasmer; Marguerite Roemer; John Hamilton; John Bunter; Christopher R Braden; Thomas M Shinnick; Edward P Desmond
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.883

6.  Estimated costs of false laboratory diagnoses of tuberculosis in three patients.

Authors:  Jill M Northrup; Ann C Miller; Edward Nardell; Sharon Sharnprapai; Sue Etkind; Jeffrey Driscoll; Michael McGarry; Harry W Taber; Paul Elvin; Noreen L Qualls; Christopher R Braden
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.883

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.