Literature DB >> 10905441

Anterior lumbar interbody fusion with threaded fusion cages and autologous bone grafts.

P W Pavlov1, M Spruit, M Havinga, P G Anderson, J van Limbeek, W C Jacobs.   

Abstract

The goal of this study was to evaluate the ability of Ray threaded fusion cages, when used in an anterior approach, to restore intervertebral height and to improve the functional and occupational performance of the patients. The present study was initiated because insertion of fusion cages through a posterior approach causes destruction of facet joints and violation of the spinal canal. The anterior approach for insertion of threaded fusion cages to accomplish lumbar interbody fusion was evaluated in a series of 13 patients suffering monosegmental disc disease. The patients' functional and occupational performance was evaluated using the Prolo score. Radiological measurements were used to evaluate disc height and degree of penetration into the endplates, and to confirm fusion. Seven of the 13 patients were short-term failures and had to be revised within 2 years. The study found that revised patients had poorer Prolo scores than non-revised patients. Although for the non-revised patients, the mean Prolo scores remained relatively stable during the 1st year, they dropped after 3 years. We were not able to identify any further clinical or radiological differences between the groups. These results indicate that although the anterior approach seems technically suitable for insertion of threaded fusion cages, destruction of the anterior longitudinal ligament and the anterior part of the annulus fibrosis appears to result in destabilisation of the motion segment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10905441      PMCID: PMC3611401          DOI: 10.1007/s005869900115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  5 in total

1.  The importance of the endplate for interbody cages in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Anne Polikeit; Stephen J Ferguson; Lutz P Nolte; Tracy E Orr
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-05-29       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Factors influencing stresses in the lumbar spine after the insertion of intervertebral cages: finite element analysis.

Authors:  Anne Polikeit; Stephen J Ferguson; Lutz P Nolte; Tracy E Orr
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-12-19       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Revision of Failed Sacroiliac Joint Posterior Interpositional Structural Allograft Stabilization with Lateral Porous Titanium Implants: A Multicenter Case Series.

Authors:  Andy Kranenburg; Gabriel Garcia-Diaz; Judson H Cook; Michael Thambuswamy; Whitney James; David Stevens; Adam Bruggeman; Ying Chen; Robyn Capobianco; W Carlton Reckling; Joel D Siegal
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2022-07-20

4.  Biomechanical comparison of a new stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion cage with established fixation techniques - a three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Authors:  Shih-Hao Chen; Ching-Lung Tai; Chien-Yu Lin; Pang-Hsing Hsieh; Weng-Pin Chen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 2.362

5.  Biomechanical comparison of three stand-alone lumbar cages--a three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Authors:  Shih-Hao Chen; Ming-Chieh Chiang; Jin-Fu Lin; Shang-Chih Lin; Ching-Hua Hung
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 2.362

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.