Literature DB >> 10902691

Metabolic compensation during high energy output in fasting, lactating grey seals (Halichoerus grypus): metabolic ceilings revisited.

J A Mellish1, S J Iverson, W D Bowen.   

Abstract

Lactation is the most energetically expensive period for female mammals and is associated with some of the highest sustained metabolic rates (SusMR) in vertebrates (reported as total energy throughput). Females typically deal with this energy demand by increasing food intake and the structure of the alimentary tract may act as the central constraint to ceilings on SusMR at about seven times resting or standard metabolic rate (SMR). However, demands of lactation may also be met by using a form of metabolic compensation such as reducing locomotor activities or entering torpor. In some phocid seals, cetaceans and bears, females fast throughout lactation and thus cannot offset the high energetic costs of lactation through increased food intake. We demonstrate that fasting grey seal females sustain, for several weeks, one of the highest total daily energy expenditures (DEE; 7.4 x SMR) reported in mammals, while progressively reducing maintenance metabolic expenditures during lactation through means not explained by reduction in lean body mass or behavioural changes. Simultaneously, the energy-exported in milk is progressively increased, associated with increased lipoprotein lipase activity in the mammary gland, resulting in greater offspring growth. Our results suggest that females use compensatory mechanisms to help meet the extraordinary energetic costs of lactation. Additionally, although the concepts of SusMR and ceilings on total DEE may be somewhat different in fasting lactating species, our data on phocid seals demonstrate that metabolic ceilings on milk energy output, in general, are not constrained by the same kind of peripheral limitations as are other energy-consuming tissues. In phocid seals, the high ceilings on DEE during lactation, coupled with metabolic compensation, are undoubtedly important factors enabling shortened lactation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10902691      PMCID: PMC1690663          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  16 in total

1.  Cytoplasmic sequestration of p53 in cytomegalovirus-infected human endothelial cells.

Authors:  A Kovacs; M L Weber; L J Burns; H S Jacob; G M Vercellotti
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.307

2.  Estimation of total body water in pinnipeds using hydrogen-isotope dilution.

Authors:  W D Bowen; S J Iverson
Journal:  Physiol Zool       Date:  1998 May-Jun

3.  Lactational efficiency complex of rats: provisional model for interpretation of energy balance data.

Authors:  J J Romero; R Cañas; R L Baldwin; L J Koong
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 4.034

4.  Diminution in energy expenditure during lactation.

Authors:  P J Illingworth; R T Jung; P W Howie; P Leslie; T E Isles
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1986-02-15

5.  Sustained metabolic scope.

Authors:  C C Peterson; K A Nagy; J Diamond
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Biochemical principles of metabolic depression.

Authors:  M Guppy; C J Fuery; J E Flanigan
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  1994 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 2.231

7.  Decreased capacity for non-shivering thermogenesis during lactation in mice.

Authors:  P Trayhurn
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 3.657

8.  Measurement of the body composition of living gray seals by hydrogen isotope dilution.

Authors:  J J Reilly; M A Fedak
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1990-09

9.  Maximal sustained energy budgets in humans and animals.

Authors:  K A Hammond; J Diamond
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-04-03       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Is mammary output capacity limiting to lactational performance in mice?

Authors:  K A Hammond; K C Lloyd; J Diamond
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  5 in total

1.  Heat loss in air of an Antarctic marine mammal, the Weddell seal.

Authors:  Jo-Ann Mellish; Allyson Hindle; John Skinner; Markus Horning
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 2.200

2.  Foraging decisions in a capital breeder: trade-offs between mass gain and lactation.

Authors:  Sandra Hamel; Steeve D Côté
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Meeting the energy demands of reproduction in female koalas, Phascolarctos cinereus: evidence for energetic compensation.

Authors:  A Krockenberger
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2003-06-21       Impact factor: 2.200

4.  Key questions in marine mammal bioenergetics.

Authors:  Elizabeth A McHuron; Stephanie Adamczak; John P Y Arnould; Erin Ashe; Cormac Booth; W Don Bowen; Fredrik Christiansen; Magda Chudzinska; Daniel P Costa; Andreas Fahlman; Nicholas A Farmer; Sarah M E Fortune; Cara A Gallagher; Kelly A Keen; Peter T Madsen; Clive R McMahon; Jacob Nabe-Nielsen; Dawn P Noren; Shawn R Noren; Enrico Pirotta; David A S Rosen; Cassie N Speakman; Stella Villegas-Amtmann; Rob Williams
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2022-08-06       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Energetic limits: Defining the bounds and trade-offs of successful energy management in a capital breeder.

Authors:  Courtney R Shuert; Lewis G Halsey; Patrick P Pomeroy; Sean D Twiss
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2020-09-07       Impact factor: 5.091

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.