Literature DB >> 10902552

Beam orientation optimization in intensity-modulated radiation treatment planning.

A B Pugachev1, A L Boyer, L Xing.   

Abstract

Beam direction optimization is an important problem in radiation therapy. In intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), the difficulty for computer optimization of the beam directions arises from the fact that they are coupled with the intensity profiles of the incident beams. In order to obtain the optimal incident beam directions using iterative or stochastic methods, the beam profiles ought to be optimized after every change of beam configuration. In this paper we report an effective algorithm to optimize gantry angles for IMRT. In our calculation the gantry angles and the beam profiles (beamlet weights) were treated as two separate groups of variables. The gantry angles were sampled according to a simulated annealing algorithm. For each sampled beam configuration, beam profile calculation was done using a fast filtered backprojection (FBP) method. Simulated annealing was also used for beam profile optimization to examine the performance of the FBP for beam orientation optimization. Relative importance factors were incorporated into the objective function to control the relative importance of the target and the sensitive structures. Minimization of the objective function resulted in the best possible beam orientations and beam profiles judged by the given objective function. The algorithm was applied to several model problems and the results showed that the approach has potential for IMRT applications.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10902552     DOI: 10.1118/1.599001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  9 in total

1.  Intensity modulated radiation therapy with field rotation--a time-varying fractionation study.

Authors:  Delal Dink; Mark P Langer; Ronald L Rardin; Joseph F Pekny; Gintaras V Reklaitis; Behlul Saka
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2012-01-10

2.  Simultaneous navigation of multiple Pareto surfaces, with an application to multicriteria IMRT planning with multiple beam angle configurations.

Authors:  David Craft; Michael Monz
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Dosimetric quantification of dose fall-off in liver SBRT planning using dual photon energy IMRT.

Authors:  J Henry; C Moreno; R L Crownover; D Baacke; N Papanikolaou; A N Gutierrez
Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT       Date:  2016

4.  An experimental investigation on the effect of beam angle optimization on the reduction of beam numbers in IMRT of head and neck tumors.

Authors:  V K Sathiya Narayanan; R Vaitheeswaran; Janhavi R Bhangle; Sumit Basu; Vikram Maiya; Bhooshan Zade
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Planning quality and delivery efficiency of sMLC delivered IMRT treatment of oropharyngeal cancers evaluated by RTOG H-0022 dosimetric criteria.

Authors:  X Ronald Zhu; Christopher J Schultz; Michael T Gillin
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Plan optimization with L0-norm and group sparsity constraints for a new rotational, intensity-modulated brachytherapy for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Hojin Kim; Young Kyung Lim; Youngmoon Goh; Chiyoung Jeong; Ui-Jung Hwang; Sang Hyoun Choi; Byungchul Cho; Jungwon Kwak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The Scatter Search Based Algorithm for Beam Angle Optimization in Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy.

Authors:  Ali Ghanbarzadeh; Majid Pouladian; Ali Shabestani Monfared; Seied Rabi Mahdavi
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2018-06-03       Impact factor: 2.238

8.  Determination of optimal number of beams in direct machine parameter optimization-based intensity modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cases.

Authors:  Vaitheeswaran Ranganathan; K J Maria Das
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

9.  Comparing planning time, delivery time and plan quality for IMRT, RapidArc and Tomotherapy.

Authors:  Mike Oliver; Will Ansbacher; Wayne A Beckham
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 2.102

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.