Literature DB >> 10901927

Validation of a malnutrition screening tool for patients receiving radiotherapy.

M L Ferguson1, J Bauer, B Gallagher, S Capra, D R Christie, B R Mason.   

Abstract

Nutrition screening identifies individuals who are malnourished or at risk of becoming malnourished and who may benefit from nutrition support. The aim of this study was to validate a new malnutrition screening tool (MST) in cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy. The MST was compared with the subjective global assessment (SGA) of nutritional status. One hundred and six patients attending two cancer care centres in Australia were independently rated as well nourished or malnourished using SGA and at risk or not at risk of malnutrition using the MST. Convergent validity of the MST was established by determining the ability of the MST to predict SGA. According to SGA, 89% of the patients were well nourished and 11% were moderately malnourished. According to the MST, 28% of patients were at risk of malnutrition. The MST had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 81%. The positive predictive value was 0.4 and the negative predictive value was 1.0. The MST is easy to use and is a strong predictor of nutritional status. The malnutrition screening tool is a simple, quick, valid tool that can be used to identify radiation oncology outpatients who are at risk of malnutrition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10901927     DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-1673.1999.433665.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Australas Radiol        ISSN: 0004-8461


  25 in total

1.  Malnutrition screening programs in adult cancer patients: clinical practice is hungry for evidence.

Authors:  K Biggs
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.677

2.  Impact of Obesity on Quality of Life, Psychological Distress, and Coping on Patients with Colon Cancer.

Authors:  David Gomez; Paula Jimenez-Fonseca; Aránzazu Manzano Fernández; Patricia Cruz Castellanos; Maria Valero Arbizu; Ruth Martínez Cabañes; David Lorente Estellés; Estrella Ferreira; Jorge Del Rio; Teresa García García; Alberto Carmona-Bayonas; Caterina Calderon
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2021-02-13

3.  Nutritional screening tools in daily clinical practice: the focus on cancer.

Authors:  Michèle Leuenberger; Silvia Kurmann; Zeno Stanga
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Malnutrition in surgical wards: a plea for concern.

Authors:  Offir Ben-Ishay; Haya Gertsenzon; Tanya Mashiach; Yoram Kluger; Irit Chermesh
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 2.260

Review 5.  Hospital malnutrition: prevalence, identification and impact on patients and the healthcare system.

Authors:  Lisa A Barker; Belinda S Gout; Timothy C Crowe
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment Short Form (PG-SGA SF) is a valid screening tool in chemotherapy outpatients.

Authors:  Jessica Abbott; L Teleni; D McKavanagh; J Watson; A L McCarthy; E Isenring
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  New radiotherapy techniques do not reduce the need for nutrition intervention in patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  T Brown; M Banks; B G M Hughes; C Lin; L M Kenny; J D Bauer
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Comparison of a novel, simple nutrition screening tool for adult oncology inpatients and the Malnutrition Screening Tool (MST) against the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA).

Authors:  Clare Shaw; Catherine Fleuret; Jennifer M Pickard; Kabir Mohammed; Gayle Black; Linda Wedlake
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Nutrition outcomes following implementation of validated swallowing and nutrition guidelines for patients with head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Teresa Brown; Lynda Ross; Lee Jones; Brett Hughes; Merrilyn Banks
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 10.  Nutrition Care Process Model Approach to Surgical Prehabilitation in Oncology.

Authors:  Chelsia Gillis; Leslee Hasil; Popi Kasvis; Neil Bibby; Sarah J Davies; Carla M Prado; Malcolm A West; Clare Shaw
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2021-06-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.