Literature DB >> 10901460

Benign versus malignant osseous lesions in the lumbar vertebrae: differentiation by means of bone SPET.

P Reinartz1, J Schaffeldt, O Sabri, M Zimny, B Nowak, E Ostwald, U Cremerius, U Buell.   

Abstract

Bone scanning is a well-accepted and frequently performed diagnostic procedure with a high sensitivity, especially when single-photon emission tomography (SPET) acquisitions are added. However, the differentiation of benign from malignant osseous lesions often poses difficulty. The purpose of this study was to find out whether the particular localisation of an intraosseous lesion in a lumbar vertebra is an indicator of its aetiology. Bone scintigraphy including planar whole-body scans as well as SPET imaging of the lumbar spine was performed in 109 patients. The diagnoses of osseous lesions in the lumbar vertebrae were made strictly on the basis of the findings of magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography or plain radiography. Sixteen patients had to be excluded from the study because they did not undergo adequate radiological examination. To determine the particular localisation of vertebral lesions in the bone scan, two experienced nuclear medicine physicians examined the studies independently while blinded to the radiological results. Four anatomical regions were differentiated within the vertebra: the vertebral body, the pedicle, the facet joints and the spinous process. Clopper-Pearson analysis, which takes into account the number of examinations, yielded the following probability intervals for the malignancy of intraosseous lesions in the lumbar spine: vertebral body 36.8%-57.3%, pedicle 87.7%-100%, facet joints 0.8%-21.4% and spinous process 18.7%-81.3%. It was concluded that lesions affecting the pedicle are a strong indicator for malignancy, whereas involvement of the facet joints is usually related to benign disease. Lesions affecting the vertebral body or the spinous process do not show a clear tendency towards either malignancy or benignity. In contrast to other studies, a significant probability of malignancy (35.6%) was observed in lesions affecting exclusively the vertebral body.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10901460     DOI: 10.1007/s002590050568

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0340-6997


  14 in total

1.  Indeterminate lesions on planar bone scintigraphy in lung cancer patients: SPECT, CT or SPECT-CT?

Authors:  Punit Sharma; Rakesh Kumar; Harmandeep Singh; Chandrasekhar Bal; Pramod Kumar Julka; Sanjay Thulkar; Arun Malhotra
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-10-16       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  [SPECT/CT - Technical aspects and optimization possibilities].

Authors:  W Römer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 3.  SPECT/CT and tumour imaging.

Authors:  Gad Abikhzer; Zohar Keidar
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  The added value of multislice SPECT/CT in patients with equivocal bony metastasis from carcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  Vincent Helyar; Hosahalli K Mohan; Tara Barwick; Lefteris Livieratos; Gopinath Gnanasegaran; Susan E M Clarke; Ignac Fogelman
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  Clinical study of the application of SPECT, CT, and SPECT/CT for diagnosing rib diseases.

Authors:  Runqing Duan; Hongcheng Shi
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 6.  Comparison of choline-PET/CT, MRI, SPECT, and bone scintigraphy in the diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Guohua Shen; Houfu Deng; Shuang Hu; Zhiyun Jia
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Single photon emission computed tomography/spiral computed tomography fusion imaging for the diagnosis of bone metastasis in patients with known cancer.

Authors:  Zhen Zhao; Lin Li; Fanglan Li; Lixia Zhao
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  The value of SPECT in the detection of stress injury to the pars interarticularis in patients with low back pain.

Authors:  Katherine Zukotynski; Christine Curtis; Frederick D Grant; Lyle Micheli; S Ted Treves
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  The diagnostic value of single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography for severe sacroiliac joint dysfunction.

Authors:  Katsuhiro Tofuku; Hiroaki Koga; Setsuro Komiya
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-05-17       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Whole-body SPECT/CT for bone scintigraphy: diagnostic value and effect on patient management in oncological patients.

Authors:  H Palmedo; C Marx; A Ebert; B Kreft; Y Ko; A Türler; R Vorreuther; U Göhring; H H Schild; T Gerhardt; U Pöge; S Ezziddin; H-J Biersack; H Ahmadzadehfar
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-08-24       Impact factor: 9.236

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.