Literature DB >> 10899503

Increased frequency of chromosomal abnormalities in female partners of couples undergoing in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

A Schreurs1, E Legius, C Meuleman, J P Fryns, T M D'Hooghe.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities in female partners of couples undergoing IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).
DESIGN: Prospective study.
SETTING: Leuven University Fertility Center. PATIENT(S): Female candidates for IVF or ICSI. INTERVENTION(S): An initial cytogenetic study was performed on peripheral blood lymphocyte cultures using G- and R-banding. In all patients, > or =25 metaphases were examined. If a chromosomal aberration was detected, additional cytogenetic studies were performed for precise identification. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Abnormal female karyotypes in comparison with the general female population. RESULT(S): Cytogenetic analysis was performed in 263 female partners of couples before entering an IVF or ICSI program. The prevalence of autosomal reciprocal balanced translocations was seven times higher in the study group (1.14%) than in the general population (0.16%). All abnormal karyotypes were found in the IVF group with male factor infertility. CONCLUSION(S): Chromosomal abnormalities are more frequent in the female partners of couples seeking fertility treatment. We recommend chromosomal analysis in women before starting IVF or ICSI treatment, even in the presence of male factor infertility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10899503     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(00)00558-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  10 in total

1.  Maternal origin of 47,XXY and confined placental mosaicism 47,XXY/48,XXY,+13 in an infant conceived through IVF.

Authors:  Elizabeth X Wu; Andrew D Wilson; Edgar Chan Wong; Jon C Havelock; Sai Ma
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-04-27       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Ultrastructural and cytogenetic analyses of mature human oocyte dysmorphisms with respect to clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Mário Sousa; Mariana Cunha; Joaquina Silva; Elsa Oliveira; Maria João Pinho; Carolina Almeida; Rosália Sá; José Teixeira da Silva; Cristiano Oliveira; Alberto Barros
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Chromosomal Rearrangements as Barriers to Genetic Homogenization between Archaic and Modern Humans.

Authors:  Rebekah L Rogers
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  Analysis of balanced reciprocal translocations in patients with subfertility using single-molecule optical mapping.

Authors:  Hui Wang; Zhengjun Jia; Aiping Mao; Bing Xu; Shuling Wang; Li Wang; Sai Liu; Haiman Zhang; Xiaojie Zhang; Tao Yu; Ting Mu; Mengnan Xu; David S Cram; Yuanqing Yao
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  A meta-analysis of controlled studies comparing major malformation rates in IVF and ICSI infants with naturally conceived children.

Authors:  Alfred A Rimm; Alyce C Katayama; Mireya Diaz; K Paul Katayama
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  A Review of Outcome Data concerning Children Born following Assisted Reproductive Technologies.

Authors:  Charlotte Dupont; Christophe Sifer
Journal:  ISRN Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-06-17

7.  A retrospective chromosome studies among Iranian infertile women: Report of 21 years.

Authors:  Cyrus Azimi; Malihea Khaleghian; Farideh Farzanfar
Journal:  Iran J Reprod Med       Date:  2013-04

8.  Prevalence of chromosomal abnormalities and timing of karyotype analysis in patients with recurrent implantation failure (RIF) following assisted reproduction.

Authors:  P De Sutter; R Stadhouders; M Dutré; J Gerris; M Dhont
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2012

9.  A systematic review and standardized clinical validity assessment of genes involved in female reproductive failure.

Authors:  Ludmila Volozonoka; Anna Miskova; Liene Kornejeva; Inga Kempa; Veronika Bargatina; Linda Gailite
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 3.923

10.  The potential use of intrauterine insemination as a basic option for infertility: a review for technology-limited medical settings.

Authors:  Abdelrahman M Abdelkader; John Yeh
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2009
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.