Literature DB >> 26399483

Chromosomal Rearrangements as Barriers to Genetic Homogenization between Archaic and Modern Humans.

Rebekah L Rogers1.   

Abstract

Chromosomal rearrangements, which shuffle DNA throughout the genome, are an important source of divergence across taxa. Using a paired-end read approach with Illumina sequence data for archaic humans, I identify changes in genome structure that occurred recently in human evolution. Hundreds of rearrangements indicate genomic trafficking between the sex chromosomes and autosomes, raising the possibility of sex-specific changes. Additionally, genes adjacent to genome structure changes in Neanderthals are associated with testis-specific expression, consistent with evolutionary theory that new genes commonly form with expression in the testes. I identify one case of new-gene creation through transposition from the Y chromosome to chromosome 10 that combines the 5'-end of the testis-specific gene Fank1 with previously untranscribed sequence. This new transcript experienced copy number expansion in archaic genomes, indicating rapid genomic change. Among rearrangements identified in Neanderthals, 13% are transposition of selfish genetic elements, whereas 32% appear to be ectopic exchange between repeats. In Denisovan, the pattern is similar but numbers are significantly higher with 18% of rearrangements reflecting transposition and 40% ectopic exchange between distantly related repeats. There is an excess of divergent rearrangements relative to polymorphism in Denisovan, which might result from nonuniform rates of mutation, possibly reflecting a burst of transposable element activity in the lineage that led to Denisovan. Finally, loci containing genome structure changes show diminished rates of introgression from Neanderthals into modern humans, consistent with the hypothesis that rearrangements serve as barriers to gene flow during hybridization. Together, these results suggest that this previously unidentified source of genomic variation has important biological consequences in human evolution.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Denisovans; Neanderthals; evolutionary novelty; genome structure

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26399483      PMCID: PMC5009956          DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msv204

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Evol        ISSN: 0737-4038            Impact factor:   16.240


  92 in total

Review 1.  Comparative sequence analysis of plant nuclear genomes:m microcolinearity and its many exceptions.

Authors:  J L Bennetzen
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 11.277

2.  A human genome diversity cell line panel.

Authors:  Howard M Cann; Claudia de Toma; Lucien Cazes; Marie-Fernande Legrand; Valerie Morel; Laurence Piouffre; Julia Bodmer; Walter F Bodmer; Batsheva Bonne-Tamir; Anne Cambon-Thomsen; Zhu Chen; J Chu; Carlo Carcassi; Licinio Contu; Ruofu Du; Laurent Excoffier; G B Ferrara; Jonathan S Friedlaender; Helena Groot; David Gurwitz; Trefor Jenkins; Rene J Herrera; Xiaoyi Huang; Judith Kidd; Kenneth K Kidd; Andre Langaney; Alice A Lin; S Qasim Mehdi; Peter Parham; Alberto Piazza; Maria Pia Pistillo; Yaping Qian; Qunfang Shu; Jiujin Xu; S Zhu; James L Weber; Henry T Greely; Marcus W Feldman; Gilles Thomas; Jean Dausset; L Luca Cavalli-Sforza
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-04-12       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Dynamics of mammalian chromosome evolution inferred from multispecies comparative maps.

Authors:  William J Murphy; Denis M Larkin; Annelie Everts-van der Wind; Guillaume Bourque; Glenn Tesler; Loretta Auvil; Jonathan E Beever; Bhanu P Chowdhary; Francis Galibert; Lisa Gatzke; Christophe Hitte; Stacey N Meyers; Denis Milan; Elaine A Ostrander; Greg Pape; Heidi G Parker; Terje Raudsepp; Margarita B Rogatcheva; Lawrence B Schook; Loren C Skow; Michael Welge; James E Womack; Stephen J O'brien; Pavel A Pevzner; Harris A Lewin
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-07-22       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Increased frequency of chromosomal abnormalities in female partners of couples undergoing in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

Authors:  A Schreurs; E Legius; C Meuleman; J P Fryns; T M D'Hooghe
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Cloning of the mouse agouti gene predicts a secreted protein ubiquitously expressed in mice carrying the lethal yellow mutation.

Authors:  M W Miller; D M Duhl; H Vrieling; S P Cordes; M M Ollmann; B M Winkes; G S Barsh
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  Language features in a mother and daughter of a chromosome 7;13 translocation involving FOXP2.

Authors:  J Bruce Tomblin; Marlea O'Brien; Lawrence D Shriberg; Charles Williams; Jeff Murray; Shivanand Patil; Jonathan Bjork; Steve Anderson; Kirrie Ballard
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Fank1 is a testis-specific gene encoding a nuclear protein exclusively expressed during the transition from the meiotic to the haploid phase of spermatogenesis.

Authors:  Zhihong Zheng; Huili Zheng; Wei Yan
Journal:  Gene Expr Patterns       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 1.224

8.  Inference of human population history from individual whole-genome sequences.

Authors:  Heng Li; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  The complete genome sequence of a Neanderthal from the Altai Mountains.

Authors:  Kay Prüfer; Fernando Racimo; Nick Patterson; Flora Jay; Sriram Sankararaman; Susanna Sawyer; Anja Heinze; Gabriel Renaud; Peter H Sudmant; Cesare de Filippo; Heng Li; Swapan Mallick; Michael Dannemann; Qiaomei Fu; Martin Kircher; Martin Kuhlwilm; Michael Lachmann; Matthias Meyer; Matthias Ongyerth; Michael Siebauer; Christoph Theunert; Arti Tandon; Priya Moorjani; Joseph Pickrell; James C Mullikin; Samuel H Vohr; Richard E Green; Ines Hellmann; Philip L F Johnson; Hélène Blanche; Howard Cann; Jacob O Kitzman; Jay Shendure; Evan E Eichler; Ed S Lein; Trygve E Bakken; Liubov V Golovanova; Vladimir B Doronichev; Michael V Shunkov; Anatoli P Derevianko; Bence Viola; Montgomery Slatkin; David Reich; Janet Kelso; Svante Pääbo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Landscape of standing variation for tandem duplications in Drosophila yakuba and Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  Rebekah L Rogers; Julie M Cridland; Ling Shao; Tina T Hu; Peter Andolfatto; Kevin R Thornton
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 16.240

View more
  10 in total

1.  De novo genome assembly of the cichlid fish Astatotilapia latifasciata reveals a higher level of genomic polymorphism and genes related to B chromosomes.

Authors:  Maryam Jehangir; Syed F Ahmad; Adauto L Cardoso; Erica Ramos; Guilherme T Valente; Cesar Martins
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 4.316

2.  Meiotic Genes Are Enriched in Regions of Reduced Archaic Ancestry.

Authors:  B Jégou; S Sankararaman; A D Rolland; D Reich; F Chalmel
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 16.240

Review 3.  Hybridization as a facilitator of species range expansion.

Authors:  Karin S Pfennig; Audrey L Kelly; Amanda A Pierce
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The Genetic Cost of Neanderthal Introgression.

Authors:  Kelley Harris; Rasmus Nielsen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Model-based detection and analysis of introgressed Neanderthal ancestry in modern humans.

Authors:  Matthias Steinrücken; Jeffrey P Spence; John A Kamm; Emilia Wieczorek; Yun S Song
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  The Strength of Selection against Neanderthal Introgression.

Authors:  Ivan Juric; Simon Aeschbacher; Graham Coop
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2016-11-08       Impact factor: 5.917

7.  Tandem duplications lead to novel expression patterns through exon shuffling in Drosophila yakuba.

Authors:  Rebekah L Rogers; Ling Shao; Kevin R Thornton
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  The Mitonuclear Dimension of Neanderthal and Denisovan Ancestry in Modern Human Genomes.

Authors:  Joel Sharbrough; Justin C Havird; Gregory R Noe; Jessica M Warren; Daniel B Sloan
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.416

Review 9.  Transposable elements: genome innovation, chromosome diversity, and centromere conflict.

Authors:  Savannah J Klein; Rachel J O'Neill
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2018-01-13       Impact factor: 5.239

10.  Chromosomal rearrangements as a source of new gene formation in Drosophila yakuba.

Authors:  Nicholas B Stewart; Rebekah L Rogers
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2019-09-23       Impact factor: 5.917

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.