Literature DB >> 10899340

Surface roughness parameters as predictors of anchorage strength in bone: a critical analysis.

S Hansson1.   

Abstract

The surface roughness of a bone implant was defined parametrically. The values of the parameters defining the surface were varied. Some traditionally used surface roughness parameters were calculated. By means of a theoretical model the bone-implant interfacial shear strength was estimated. No simple correlation between the values of the surface roughness parameters and the estimated interfacial shear strength was found. It was concluded that the value of the traditional surface roughness parameters as predictors of interfacial shear strength is limited. If however a change of the surface topography of an implant is restricted to scale a positive correlation was found between the theoretical interfacial shear strength and some surface roughness parameters. It is suggested that the bone-implant interfacial shear strength in the general case be estimated by means of strength analyses based upon a study of the size, shape and density of the individual elements constituting the rough surface.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10899340     DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(00)00045-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  8 in total

1.  Nucleation and growth of calcium phosphates in the presence of fibrinogen on titanium implants with four potentially bioactive surface preparations. An in vitro study.

Authors:  Anna Arvidsson; Fredrik Currie; Per Kjellin; Young-Taeg Sul; Victoria Stenport
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  The influence of micro and macro-geometry in term of bone-implant interface in two implant systems: an histomorphometrical study.

Authors:  A Rocci; R Calcaterra; M DI Girolamo; M Rocci; C Rocci; L Baggi
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2016-07-23

Review 3.  Biomechanical behaviours of the bone-implant interface: a review.

Authors:  Xing Gao; Manon Fraulob; Guillaume Haïat
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Different performance of platform switching in equicrestal position implant: an histological study.

Authors:  A Rocci; R Calcaterra; M Rocci; C Rocci; M DI Girolamo; L Baggi
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2016-11-13

5.  Comparing the TiOblast and Osseospeed surfaces. Histomorphometric and histological analysis in humans.

Authors:  M Rocci; A Rocci; M Martignoni; T Albrektsson; A Barlattani; M Gargari
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2008-06-16

6.  Analysis of Surface Roughness and Three-dimensional Scanning Topography of Zirconia Implants before and after Photofunctionalization by Atomic Force Microscopy: An In Vitro Study.

Authors:  R Arun Jaikumar; Suma Karthigeyan; T R Ramesh Bhat; Madhulika Naidu; G R Praveen Raj; Senthil Natarajan
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2021-06-05

7.  The effect of microthread design on magnitude and distribution of stresses in bone: A three-dimensional finite element analysis.

Authors:  Shima Golmohammadi; Amir Eskandari; Mohammad Reza Movahhedy; Adileh Shirmohammadi; Reza Amid
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2018 Sep-Oct

Review 8.  Surface modification of biomedical and dental implants and the processes of inflammation, wound healing and bone formation.

Authors:  Clark M Stanford
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 5.923

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.