Literature DB >> 10898711

Analysis of organ physiology in transgenic mice.

S Rao1, A S Verkman.   

Abstract

The increasing availability of transgenic mouse models of gene deletion and human disease has mandated the development of creative approaches to characterize mouse phenotype. The mouse presents unique challenges to phenotype analysis because of its small size, habits, and inability to verbalize clinical symptoms. This review describes strategies to study mouse organ physiology, focusing on the cardiovascular, pulmonary, renal, gastrointestinal, and neurobehavioral systems. General concerns about evaluating mouse phenotype studies are discussed. Monitoring and anesthesia methods are reviewed, with emphasis on the feasibility and limitations of noninvasive and invasive procedures to monitor physiological parameters, do cannulations, and perform surgical procedures. Examples of phenotype studies are cited to demonstrate the practical applications and limitations of the measurement methods. The repertoire of phenotype analysis methods reviewed here should be useful to investigators involved in or contemplating the use of mouse models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10898711     DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.2000.279.1.C1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6143            Impact factor:   4.249


  13 in total

1.  Ventricular function during exercise in mice and rats.

Authors:  Heidi L Lujan; Hussein Janbaih; Han-Zhong Feng; Jian-Ping Jin; Stephen E DiCarlo
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 3.619

2.  Effect of Animal Condition and Fluvoxamine on the Result of [(18)F]N-3-Fluoropropyl-2β-carbomethoxy-3β-(4-iodophenyl) Nortropane ([(18)F]FP-CIT) PET Study in Mice.

Authors:  Kwang-Ho Shin; Su-A Park; Seog-Young Kim; Sang Ju Lee; Seung Jun Oh; Jae Seung Kim
Journal:  Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-11-26

3.  Determinants of cardiac electrophysiological properties in mice.

Authors:  Gregory O Appleton; Yi Li; George E Taffet; Craig J Hartley; Lloyd H Michael; Mark L Entman; Robert Roberts; Dirar S Khoury
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Safety and efficacy of various combinations of injectable anesthetics in BALB/c mice.

Authors:  Sandra Buitrago; Thomas E Martin; Joanne Tetens-Woodring; Alan Belicha-Villanueva; Gregory E Wilding
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.232

5.  A rapid enzymatic method for the isolation of defined kidney tubule fragments from mouse.

Authors:  Carsten A Wagner; Ulrike Lükewille; Patricia Valles; Sylvie Breton; Dennis Brown; Gerhard H Giebisch; John P Geibel
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2003-05-13       Impact factor: 3.657

6.  A modified fluorescent microsphere-based approach for determining resting and hyperemic blood flows in individual murine skeletal muscles.

Authors:  Trevor R Cardinal; James B Hoying
Journal:  Vascul Pharmacol       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 5.773

7.  Kidney function in mice: thiobutabarbital versus alpha-chloralose anesthesia.

Authors:  T Rieg; K Richter; H Osswald; V Vallon
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2004-09-30       Impact factor: 3.000

8.  Long-term High-Resolution Intravital Microscopy in the Lung with a Vacuum Stabilized Imaging Window.

Authors:  Carolina Rodriguez-Tirado; Takanori Kitamura; Yu Kato; Jeffery W Pollard; John S Condeelis; David Entenberg
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 1.355

9.  Anaesthesia and physiological monitoring during in vivo imaging of laboratory rodents: considerations on experimental outcomes and animal welfare.

Authors:  Jordi L Tremoleda; Angela Kerton; Willy Gsell
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 3.138

Review 10.  Mouse Anesthesia: The Art and Science.

Authors:  Kaela L Navarro; Monika Huss; Jennifer C Smith; Patrick Sharp; James O Marx; Cholawat Pacharinsak
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 1.521

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.