Literature DB >> 34180990

Mouse Anesthesia: The Art and Science.

Kaela L Navarro1, Monika Huss1, Jennifer C Smith2, Patrick Sharp3,4,5, James O Marx6, Cholawat Pacharinsak1.   

Abstract

There is an art and science to performing mouse anesthesia, which is a significant component to animal research. Frequently, anesthesia is one vital step of many over the course of a research project spanning weeks, months, or beyond. It is critical to perform anesthesia according to the approved research protocol using appropriately handled and administered pharmaceutical-grade compounds whenever possible. Sufficient documentation of the anesthetic event and procedure should also be performed to meet the legal, ethical, and research reproducibility obligations. However, this regulatory and documentation process may lead to the use of a few possibly oversimplified anesthetic protocols used for mouse procedures and anesthesia. Although a frequently used anesthetic protocol may work perfectly for each mouse anesthetized, sometimes unexpected complications will arise, and quick adjustments to the anesthetic depth and support provided will be required. As an old saying goes, anesthesia is 99% boredom and 1% sheer terror. The purpose of this review article is to discuss the science of mouse anesthesia together with the art of applying these anesthetic techniques to provide readers with the knowledge needed for successful anesthetic procedures. The authors include experiences in mouse inhalant and injectable anesthesia, peri-anesthetic monitoring, specific procedures, and treating common complications. This article utilizes key points for easy access of important messages and authors' recommendation based on the authors' clinical experiences.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Mus musculus; anesthesia; animal research; animal welfare; refinement

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34180990      PMCID: PMC9236661          DOI: 10.1093/ilar/ilab016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ILAR J        ISSN: 1084-2020            Impact factor:   1.521


  286 in total

1.  What is the optimal anesthetic protocol for measurements of cerebral autoregulation in spontaneously breathing mice?

Authors:  Zhenghui Wang; Beat Schuler; Olga Vogel; Margarete Arras; Johannes Vogel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-10-24       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Endoscopy of the gastroduodenal mucosa after carprofen, meloxicam and ketoprofen administration in dogs.

Authors:  S F Forsyth; W G Guilford; S J Haslett; J Godfrey
Journal:  J Small Anim Pract       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.522

3.  Prevalence of dysphoria after fentanyl in dogs undergoing stifle surgery.

Authors:  Willem M Becker; Khursheed R Mama; Sangeeta Rao; Ross H Palmer; Erick L Egger
Journal:  Vet Surg       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 1.495

4.  A Comparison of Ketamine or Etomidate Combined with Xylazine for Intraperitoneal Anesthesia in Four Mouse Strains.

Authors:  Crystal H Gergye; Yixuan Zhao; Reneé H Moore; Vanessa K Lee
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 1.232

5.  Comparison of newly developed inhalation anesthesia system and intraperitoneal anesthesia on the hemodynamic state in mice.

Authors:  Yoshikazu Matsuda; Kazumasa Ohsaka; Hidekazu Yamamoto; Katsuhiko Natsume; Shirokazu Hirabayashi; Masayoshi Kounoike; Masaaki Inoue
Journal:  Biol Pharm Bull       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.233

Review 6.  Mechanisms of the antinociceptive action of gabapentin.

Authors:  Jen-Kun Cheng; Lih-Chu Chiou
Journal:  J Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2006-02-11       Impact factor: 3.337

7.  Increased pain sensitivity and decreased opioid analgesia in T-cell-deficient mice and implications for sex differences.

Authors:  Sarah F Rosen; Boram Ham; Michael Haichin; Ilana C Walters; Sarasa Tohyama; Susana G Sotocinal; Jeffrey S Mogil
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 6.961

8.  Analgesic treatment with buprenorphine should be adapted to the mouse strain.

Authors:  Juliane Rudeck; Silvia Vogl; Céline Heinl; Matthias Steinfath; Sebastian Fritzwanker; Andrea Kliewer; Stefan Schulz; Gilbert Schönfelder; Bettina Bert
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 3.533

9.  Anesthetic effects of a mixture of medetomidine, midazolam and butorphanol in two strains of mice.

Authors:  Yumiko Kirihara; Mayumi Takechi; Kaoru Kurosaki; Yuta Kobayashi; Tsutomu Kurosawa
Journal:  Exp Anim       Date:  2013

10.  Pain and Laboratory Animals: Publication Practices for Better Data Reproducibility and Better Animal Welfare.

Authors:  Larry Carbone; Jamie Austin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of Active Warming and Surgical Draping for Perioperative Thermal Support in Laboratory Mice.

Authors:  Kaitlyn T Bailey; Sanket R Jantre; Frank R Lawrence; F Claire Hankenson; Jacquelyn M Del Valle
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 1.706

2.  Development of a New Integrated System for Vital Sign Monitoring in Small Animals.

Authors:  Regina G Oliveira; Pedro M M Correia; Ana L M Silva; Pedro M C C Encarnação; Fabiana M Ribeiro; Ismael F Castro; João F C A Veloso
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-03       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 3.  Glycinergic Modulation of Pain in Behavioral Animal Models.

Authors:  Julian M Peiser-Oliver; Sally Evans; David J Adams; Macdonald J Christie; Robert J Vandenberg; Sarasa A Mohammadi
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 5.988

4.  Luseogliflozin inhibits high glucose-induced TGF-β2 expression in mouse cardiomyocytes by suppressing NHE-1 activity.

Authors:  Naoya Osaka; Yusaku Mori; Michishige Terasaki; Munenori Hiromura; Tomomi Saito; Hironori Yashima; Yoshie Shiraga; Raichi Kawakami; Makoto Ohara; Tomoyasu Fukui; Sho-Ichi Yamagishi
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2022-05       Impact factor: 1.573

Review 5.  A guideline proposal for mice preparation and care in 18F-FDG PET imaging.

Authors:  F M Ribeiro; P M M Correia; A C Santos; J F C A Veloso
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 3.434

6.  Wound healing in db/db mice with type 2 diabetes using non-contact exposure with an argon non-thermal atmospheric pressure plasma jet device.

Authors:  Arya Iswara; Kenta Tanaka; Tatsuo Ishijima; Yukari Nakajima; Kanae Mukai; Yasunori Tanaka; Yusuke Nakano; Junko Sugama; Makoto Oe; Mayumi Okuwa; Toshio Nakatani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 3.752

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.