Literature DB >> 10898347

Bisphosphonates in multiple myeloma.

J A Kanis1, E V McCloskey.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Myelomatosis is associated with considerable skeletal morbidity, particularly bone pain and fractures. Hypercalcaemia is a common presenting feature but less common after adequate chemotherapy. These complications are caused by progressive focal and generalized osteolysis due, in turn, to increased activation of osteoclasts by osteoclast activating factors. These include tumor necrosis factor-beta, interleukin-1, and interleukin-6. The knowledge that disturbed bone remodeling is due to the activation of authentic osteoclasts provides the rationale for the use of bisphosphonates in myelomatosis.
METHODS: This article reviews the place of bisphosphonates in the management of myeloma.
RESULTS: There is good evidence that hypercalcaemia can be corrected with intravenous or oral bisphosphonates, and they are now the specific treatment of choice. Several studies have shown that their intravenous administration is beneficial in the acute management of bone pain due to malignancy, but studies in myelomatosis are lacking. In contrast, a number of well designed controlled studies have shown significant effects of long term treatment with clodronate and pamidronate to decrease the incidence of skeletal complications in myelomatosis. Benefits reported are a decreased incidence of bone pain, hypercalcaemia, vertebral and long-bone fractures, and the extension of osteolytic lesions. There may be a beneficial effect on survival, but this is much less certain.
CONCLUSIONS: These agents provide a valuable adjunct to the management of myelomatosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10898347     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(20000615)88:12+<3022::aid-cncr19>3.0.co;2-r

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  7 in total

Review 1.  Advances in the understanding of myeloma bone disease and tumour growth.

Authors:  Shmuel Yaccoby
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 6.998

2.  Maintaining bone health in patients with multiple myeloma: survivorship care plan of the International Myeloma Foundation Nurse Leadership Board.

Authors:  Teresa S Miceli; Kathleen Colson; Beth M Faiman; Kena Miller; Joseph D Tariman
Journal:  Clin J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.027

Review 3.  The clinical and cost considerations of bisphosphonates in preventing bone complications in patients with metastatic breast cancer or multiple myeloma.

Authors:  E V McCloskey; J F Guest; J A Kanis
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Anti-transforming growth factor ß antibody treatment rescues bone loss and prevents breast cancer metastasis to bone.

Authors:  Swati Biswas; Jeffry S Nyman; JoAnn Alvarez; Anwesa Chakrabarti; Austin Ayres; Julie Sterling; James Edwards; Tapasi Rana; Rachelle Johnson; Daniel S Perrien; Scott Lonning; Yu Shyr; Lynn M Matrisian; Gregory R Mundy
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Problems monitoring response in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Conor D Collins
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2005-11-23       Impact factor: 3.909

6.  Apomine enhances the antitumor effects of lovastatin on myeloma cells by down-regulating 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase.

Authors:  Anke J Roelofs; Claire M Edwards; R Graham G Russell; F Hal Ebetino; Michael J Rogers; Philippa A Hulley
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2007-04-05       Impact factor: 4.030

7.  Recognition of nonpeptide antigens by human V gamma 9V delta 2 T cells requires contact with cells of human origin.

Authors:  A E Green; A Lissina; S L Hutchinson; R E Hewitt; B Temple; D James; J M Boulter; D A Price; A K Sewell
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.330

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.