Literature DB >> 10898338

Complications of bone metastases: surgical management.

J H Healey1, H K Brown.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with metastatic disease to the bone present a management challenge. Of the complications encountered in these patients, the predominant types that require surgical intervention are pathologic or impending fractures and neurologic compromise secondary to cord compression from spinal metastases. A multimodality approach is helpful in caring for these patients, and addressing complications related to bony metastatic disease with timely and appropriate intervention is an important step in optimizing care and quality of life.
METHODS: This article incorporates information from multiple sources and presents recent reviews of the experience at the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center with acetabular reconstruction for metastatic lesions, and with the use of the posterolateral transpedicular approach to address metastatic disease in the spine.
RESULTS: Of 55 patients who underwent reconstruction of the acetabulum for metastatic disease, although there was a 25% incidence of local disease progression, there was only a 9% incidence of late fixation failure. Of the 41 who were evaluable at 3 months, 83% continued to experience significant pain relief, and 50% of nonambulatory patients regained walking ability secondary to the procedure. Of the patients with more than 2 years of follow-up, 86% maintained pain relief and 71% maintained their ability to ambulate and function in their community. The preliminary series of 25 patients managed with a posterolateral transpedicular approach to address metastatic disease in the spine showed excellent tumor control, pain relief, and neurologic preservation with the technique. Particular benefit was obtained for patients with extensive epidural disease in which an anterior approach was contraindicated.
CONCLUSIONS: Although a multimodality approach to the treatment of patients with metastatic disease to bone combining appropriate surgical intervention with systemic therapy and radiation can entail a major operative procedure, the overall benefits to a patient's quality of life outweigh the risks in most cases. Clinician awareness of the various therapeutic options and their indications, and aggressive advocacy of quality of life for these patients, can improve the care delivered to people with metastatic disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10898338     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(20000615)88:12+<2940::aid-cncr10>3.0.co;2-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  25 in total

1.  A meta-analysis of surgery versus conventional radiotherapy for the treatment of metastatic spinal epidural disease.

Authors:  Paul Klimo; Clinton J Thompson; John R W Kestle; Meic H Schmidt
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 12.300

2.  Interdisciplinary clinical evaluation of 58 patients with lumbar-vertebral metastases from cervico-uterine cancer.

Authors:  Víctor Valdespino Gómez; Juan M Salgado Cazares; Gaspar González Astudillo; Víctor E Valdespino Castillo
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  Metastatic disease of the long bones: a review of the health care burden in a major trauma centre.

Authors:  Michael Kelly; Mitchell Lee; Paul Clarkson; Peter J O'Brien
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 4.  A Focused Review of Safety Considerations in Cancer Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Susan Maltser; Adrian Cristian; Julie K Silver; G Stephen Morris; Nicole L Stout
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 2.298

5.  [Surgical management of vertebral column metastatic disease].

Authors:  K-D Schaser; I Melcher; T Mittlmeier; A Schulz; J H Seemann; N P Haas; A C Disch
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 6.  Role of stereotactic body radiotherapy in spinal metastasis and subsequent fracture risk: identifying and treating the at-risk patient.

Authors:  Mekhail Anwar; Igor J Barani
Journal:  CNS Oncol       Date:  2013-09

Review 7.  Systematic review of role of bisphosphonates on skeletal morbidity in metastatic cancer.

Authors:  J R Ross; Y Saunders; P M Edmonds; S Patel; K E Broadley; S R D Johnston
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-08-30

8.  Approaches for modelling interstitial ultrasound ablation of tumours within or adjacent to bone: theoretical and experimental evaluations.

Authors:  Serena J Scott; Punit Prakash; Vasant Salgaonkar; Peter D Jones; Richard N Cam; Misung Han; Viola Rieke; E Clif Burdette; Chris J Diederich
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.914

9.  Prophylactic stabilization for bone metastases, myeloma, or lymphoma: do we need to protect the entire bone?

Authors:  Hasham M Alvi; Timothy A Damron
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 10.  Reducing the burden of bone metastases: current concepts and treatment options.

Authors:  Roger von Moos; Cora Sternberg; Jean-Jacques Body; Carsten Bokemeyer
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.