Literature DB >> 10895851

Differences in the performance of commercially available 10-g monofilaments.

J Booth1, M J Young.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This independent study was designed to determine the accuracy of 10-g monofilaments manufactured and supplied by popular commercial companies. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 160 new 10-g monofilaments (30 Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments [North Coast Medical], 30 Timesco/Sensory Testing Systems monofilaments, 50 Owen Mumford Neuropens, and 50 Bailey Instruments monofilaments) were tested using a calibrated load cell. Each monofilament was subjected to 10 mechanical bucklings of 10 mm while the load cell detected the maximum buckling force. Longevity testing was performed on a subset of the monofilaments by subjecting them to continuous compressions until the buckling force was <9 g.
RESULTS: The accuracy of monofilaments to produce a buckling force of 10 g varies among manufacturers. Bailey Instruments and Owen Mumford filaments were the most accurate with 100% buckling within +/-1.0 g of 10 g. Only 70% of the Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments from North Coast Medical buckled within +/-1.0 g of 10 g. A total of 80% of Timesco filaments buckled at <8 g. Longevity tests on Bailey Instruments and Owen Mumford monofilaments demonstrated that 80% continued to buckle within 10% of 10 g after 100 compressions, but only 50% were within this range after 200 compressions. The maximum amount of recovery achieved in any monofilament occurred within 24 h.
CONCLUSIONS: Monofilaments made by either Bailey Instruments or Owen Mumford are recommended for use in clinical practice. North Coast Medical monofilaments may operate differently in the U.S. because of different environmental conditions such as differences in humidity. Timesco/Sensory Testing Systems monofilaments were neither accurate enough nor Conformity European marked to recommend their use in the U.K. Longevity and recovery testing suggest that each monofilament will survive usage on approximately 10 patients before needing a recovery time of 24 h before further use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10895851     DOI: 10.2337/diacare.23.7.984

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  23 in total

Review 1.  Screening for the high-risk foot of ulceration: tests of somatic and autonomic nerve function.

Authors:  Vasiliki Argiana; Ioanna Eleftheriadou; Nicholas Tentolouris
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 2.  Risk assessment of the diabetic foot and wound.

Authors:  Stephanie Wu; David G Armstrong
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Novel insights on diagnosis, cause and treatment of diabetic neuropathy: focus on painful diabetic neuropathy.

Authors:  Mitra Tavakoli; Omar Asghar; Uazman Alam; Ioannis N Petropoulos; Hassan Fadavi; Rayaz A Malik
Journal:  Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.565

4.  Screening patients at risk for diabetic foot ulceration: a comparison between measurement of vibration perception threshold and 10-g monofilament test.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Richard; Lise Reilhes; Stéphanie Buvry; Monique Goletto; Jean-Luc Faillie
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 5.  Diagnosis and management of diabetic neuropathy.

Authors:  Bruce A Perkins; Vera Bril
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.810

6.  Gait characteristics in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Jerrold Petrofsky; Scott Lee; Salameh Bweir
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Threshold for detection of diabetic peripheral sensory neuropathy using a range of research grade monofilaments in persons with Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Mary P Thomson; Julia Potter; Paul M Finch; Richard B Paisey
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 2.303

8.  A Comparative study of examination scores and quantitative sensory testing in diagnosis of diabetic polyneuropathy.

Authors:  A Mythili; K Dileep Kumar; K A V Subrahmanyam; K Venkateswarlu; Raju G Butchi
Journal:  Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries       Date:  2010-01

Review 9.  The diabetic foot: from art to science. The 18th Camillo Golgi lecture.

Authors:  A J M Boulton
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2004-07-28       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 10.  Distal Sensorimotor Neuropathy: Improvements in Diagnosis.

Authors:  Prashanth R J Vas; Sanjeev Sharma; Gerry Rayman
Journal:  Rev Diabet Stud       Date:  2015-08-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.