Literature DB >> 10894595

Colorectal cancer screening and surveillance practices by primary care physicians: results of a national survey.

V K Sharma1, R Vasudeva, C W Howden.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Screening for colorectal cancer reduces its morbidity and mortality and is cost-effective. Screening is usually the responsibility of primary care physicians who may be unsure about its implementation. We aimed to assess primary care physicians' knowledge and practice regarding colorectal cancer screening, and to compare their responses with those of three national experts and with published guidelines.
METHODS: We mailed a postal questionnaire to 2,310 primary care physicians regarding demographics, nature of practice, use of screening tests, and six hypothetical patients who may have been candidates for screening or surveillance. We used published national guidelines and the collective opinions of the three external experts as the so-called "gold standard."
RESULTS: Of all respondents, 85.1% offered colorectal cancer screening. Most used suitable tests, starting at an appropriate age; 49.8% continued screening indefinitely irrespective of patients' age and 43.6% performed fecal occult blood testing without appropriate dietary advice to patients. Also, respondents frequently performed this test for inappropriate indications. Only 51.8% would follow a positive fecal occult blood test with colonoscopy.
CONCLUSIONS: Colorectal cancer screening practices by primary care physicians vary considerably from those recommended. Many offer screening to individuals in whom it is not appropriate, and continue it into advanced age. Frequent, inappropriate use of fecal occult blood tests will produce many false positives. Primary care physicians often do not appropriately follow a positive test. Further educational efforts are needed in an attempt to improve practice and further reduce the morbidity and mortality from colorectal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10894595     DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2000.02093.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  24 in total

1.  Colorectal cancer screening: physicians' knowledge of risk assessment and guidelines, practice, and description of barriers and facilitators.

Authors:  Maida J Sewitch; Pascal Burtin; Martin Dawes; Mark Yaffe; Linda Snell; Mark Roper; Patrizia Zanelli; Alan Pavilanis
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.522

2.  Effectiveness of complete diagnostic examination in clinical practice settings.

Authors:  Masahito Jimbo; Birgit Meyer; Terry Hyslop; James Cocroft; Barbara J Turner; David S Weinberg; Ronald E Myers
Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev       Date:  2006-11-17

3.  Effectiveness of a provider reminder on fecal occult blood test follow-up.

Authors:  Meaghan F Larson; Cynthia W Ko; Jason A Dominitz
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Knowledge and Awareness of Colorectal Cancer Early Warning Signs and Risk Factors among University Students in Jordan.

Authors:  Nizar M Mhaidat; Belal A Al-Husein; Karem H Alzoubi; Dima I Hatamleh; Youcef Khader; Sinaa Matalqah; Abla Albsoul
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Prevalence of significant neoplasia in FOBT-positive patients on warfarin compared with those not on warfarin.

Authors:  Lulu Iles-Shih; Judy F Collins; Jennifer L Holub; David A Lieberman
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Colonoscopic evaluation of hematochezia in low and average risk patients for colorectal cancer: a prospective study.

Authors:  Puglisi Carlo; Russo-Francesco Paolo; Barbera Carmelo; Incarbone Salvatore; Aprile Giuseppe; Bonanno Giacomo; Russo Antonio
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-12-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Randomized controlled trial of the impact of intensive patient education on compliance with fecal occult blood testing.

Authors:  Charlene L Stokamer; Craig T Tenner; Jhuma Chaudhuri; Eva Vazquez; Edmund J Bini
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 8.  Hematochezia in the young patient: a review of health-seeking behavior, physician attitudes, and controversies in management.

Authors:  Rashid Khan; David Hyman
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Using a multifaceted approach to improve the follow-up of positive fecal occult blood test results.

Authors:  Hardeep Singh; Himabindu Kadiyala; Gayathri Bhagwath; Anila Shethia; Hashem El-Serag; Annette Walder; Maria E Velez; Laura A Petersen
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 10.864

10.  Patients' views on follow up of colorectal cancer: implications for risk communication and decision making.

Authors:  S Papagrigoriadis; B Heyman
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.401

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.